Section 78 - Judgment Search Results

Manekchowk and Ahmedabad Manufacturing Company, Ltd. Vs. Industrial Co ...

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (1969)GLR786; (1967)ILLJ463Guj

..... of an industrial matter specified in sch iii and matters arising out of such change section 78 1 a a would thus govern the present case inasmuch as the labour court has ..... pursuance of the consent terms placed before us labour and industrial punishment section 15 of industrial disputes act 1947 and section 78 of bombay industrial relations act 1946 respondent was dismissed from service .....

Assistant Commercial Taxes Officer Vs. Bajaj Electricals Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (2009)1SCC308; (2008)18VST436(SC):2008AIRSCW8263

..... rajasthan sales tax rules 1955 as well as provisions of section 78 2 and section 78 5 of the 1994 act read with rules 53 and ..... rajasthan sales tax rules 1955 as well as provisions of section 78 2 and section 78 5 of the 1994 act read with rules 53 and ..... nearest border check posts established under sub section 1 of section 78 the existing clause b of the section 78 is being amended to make it mandatory .....

Chhotabhai Jethabhai Patel Vs. Industrial Court, Nagpur

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1967MhLJ40

..... labour court petitioner challenged order of state industrial tribunal restrictions of section 78 1 a a i cannot control procedure or powers of labour ..... or 42 4 of the bombay industrial relations act 8 section 78 1 d has been introduced for the first time in the ..... various amendments were effected including addition of para d to s 78 1 section 42 4 itself has been slightly amended by making a separate .....

Vithoba Maruti Chavan Vs. S.Taki Bilgrami and anr.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1965Bom81; (1964)66BOMLR426; ILR1964Bom778

..... question relating to the scope and ambit of the powers of the labour court under section 78 of the bombay industrial relations act 1946 arises in this petition the petitioner was employed ..... relations between the employer and the employee in respect of punishment including dismissal for misconduct section 78 in terms empowers the labour court to decide disputes regarding the propriety or legality of .....

Guljag Industries Vs. Commercial Taxes Officer

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [2007]293ITR584(SC); JT2007(10)SC1; 2007(9)SCALE564; (2007)7SCC269; (2007)9VST1(SC); 2007AIRSCW5044

..... then strict liability comes in in the form of section 78 5 of the said act breach of section 78 2 imposes strict liability under section 78 5 because as stated above goods in movement cannot ..... appeal whether mens rea is essential ingredient to be considered before imposing penalty under section 78 5 of act held section 78 5 of act enacted to provide remedy for loss of revenue and not .....

Shripatrao Limbaji Kadam and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1979Bom222; (1979)81BOMLR504; 1979MhLJ267

..... facts are undisputed the dispute relates to the interpretation of the provisions of sub section 1 of section 78 of the maharashtra cooperative societies act 1960 and more particularly the powers and rights ..... the situation requires that the administrator or the committee under clause a of sub section 1 of section 78 must continue the administration for the purpose mentioned above the registrar has an .....

Sadashiv S/O Ganpatrao Mahajan Vs. the Honand#8217;ble Minister for Co ...

Court: Mumbai Nagpur

..... as to costs constitution of india article 226 maharashtra co operative societies act 1960 section 73ea ii section 78 1 section 152 maharashtra co operative societies amendment rules 2012 rule 64 2 disqualification of ..... short 8220 the said society 8221 3 in exercise of the power under sub section 1 of section 78 of the said act the respondent no 2 divisional joint registrar co operative societies .....

D.P. Metals Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: [2001]121STC311(Raj); 2001(4)WLC115; 2000(3)WLN445

..... breach of any of the obligation under section 78 2 levy of penalty under section 78 8 read with section 78 5 is not restricted to breach of provision of section 78 2 a as is in the ..... carrier to the goods in movement as is apparent from sub section 2 of section 78 of the act referred to above section 78 by itself does not cast any obligation on the dealer who .....

The Municipal Corporation of the City of Ahmedabad Vs. Jhaveri Keshavl ...

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (1965)6GLR228

..... they were cited before us but it clearly appears from section 78 that the preparation of the assessment list is essential to the ..... the learned judge has stated that it clearly appears from section 78 that the preparation of the assessment list is essential to the ..... these observations clearly show that the assessment list prepared under section 78 is merely a draft list prepared ex parte and it has no .....

The Manager, the Asoka Mills Ltd. Vs. the Industrial Court and ors.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: AIR1964Guj198; (1964)0GLR300

..... proviso enacts that in such a case the remedy under section 78 1 a c and section 78 1 c a being made available to the employee notwithstanding ..... by the employer one is an individual remedy provided under section 78 1 a c and section 78 1 c a while the other is a remedy by ..... so is their object and purpose the remedy provided under section 78 1 a c and section 78 1 c a is a remedy to enforce the rights .....