Skip to content

Did you mean: section 2?


Section 76 - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: section 76 Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 35,223 results (0.167 seconds)
Mar 04 2002 (FN)

New York Vs. Ferc

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-04-2002

..... ofretail versus wholesale sales the fpa s plain language readily supports ferc s jurisdiction claim section 201 b gives ferc jurisdiction over electric energy in interstate commerce and the unbundled transmissions ..... agreement to have electricity transmitted between two points t brennan shock to the system 76 1996 emphasis added 5 5 ferc notes that whether transmission is in interstate commerce does .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 18 2002 (HC)

The Tamil Nadu Co-operative Milk Producers' Federation Ltd. Vs. the St ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-18-2002

Reported in: 2003(27)PTC322(Mad); [2005]141STC277(Mad)

..... was arrived at on the basis of section 76 of the trade marks act which is misconceived section 76 occurs in chapter x of the trade ..... marks act which deals with the offences penalties and procedure and section 76 deals with the cases of infringement of a trade mark by ..... infringement of his own trade mark apart from placing reliance on section 76 of the trade marks act nothing was brought to the attention .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 19 2002 (HC)

Fungicide India Ltd. Vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on: Apr-19-2002

Reported in: AIR2002J& K119,2003(1)ARBLR191(J& K)

..... arising in that case was not the one referable under section 76 of the electricity supply act 1948 the question whether the ..... rule of ejusdem generis applies or not in interpreting section 76 of the act was not finally determined however hidayatullah j ..... bombay high court considered the expression other person occurring in section 76 1 of the electricity supply act 1948 central act having .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 05 2002 (SC)

Shri Ranajoy Bose Vs. Shri A.B. Roy and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Apr-05-2002

Reported in: AIR2002SC1681; 2002(1)ALT(Cri)307; 2002CriLJ2056; 2002(2)Crimes172(SC); JT2002(3)SC545; RLW2002(3)SC452; 2002(3)SCALE356; (2002)4SCC704; [2002]2SCR955

..... of the report of the public analyst along with the complaint 12 in section 76 of the calcutta municipal act 1951 west bengal act xxxiii of 1951 cm ..... on 25 1 78 pii 213 3f 15 76 the governor in exercise of power conferred under sub section 1 of section 20 of the p f a act ..... notification no pii 211 3f 15 76 dated 25 1 1978 issued in exercise of the powers conferred by clause vii of section 2 of the p f .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 22 2002 (TRI)

Stellar Travels Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-22-2002

Reported in: (2002)(146)ELT388Tri(Mum.)bai

..... deposit of penalty of rs 92 400 imposed for contravention of section 76 and section 77 of the finance act 1994 for late payment of tax ..... part of the assistant commissioner in giving reasons for imposing penalty under section 76 of the act is to be ignored i therefore set aside the ..... penalty of rs 87 800 imposed under section 76 of the finance act 1994 the penalty of rs 4 600 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 01 2002 (SC)

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Aradhana Trading Co. and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Apr-01-2002

Reported in: AIR2002SC1626; 2002(1)ARBLR691(SC); JT2002(3)SC442; (2002)2PLR225; 2002(3)SCALE248; (2002)4SCC447; [2002]2SCR847

..... act containing a provision of appeal to the high court under section 76 1 of the act against an order of the registrar it ..... apposite application to the facts and circumstances of the present case section 76 the trade marks act confers a right of appeal to the ..... court being seized at such of the appellate jurisdiction conferred by section 76 it has to exercise jurisdiction in the same manner as it .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 22 2002 (HC)

Debita Deoho Vs. State of Arunachal Pradesh

Court: Guwahati

Decided on: Apr-22-2002

..... entitled to the benefit of the exceptions contained either in section 76 or in section 79 of the indian penal code however the circumstances ..... which if accepted would attract the general exceptions contained in sections 76 and 79 of the indian penal code 9 i have ..... or the justification which is the foundation for the applicability of sections 76 and 79 must be the reasonable belief entertained by a .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 24 2002 (HC)

Purna Cooperative Sugar Factory (Purna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana), Thro ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Oct-24-2002

Reported in: 2003(3)MhLj292

..... the learned advocate forthe respondent has also tried to seek support from thelanguage used in section 76 of the said act whichspecifically cast an obligation on the chairman or by amajority of ..... committee to call special generalmeeting in my view section 76 does not provide anyassistance in interpreting section 75 5 there is aclear mandate in sections 72 and 73 that the managementof every society .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 24 2002 (HC)

Smt. Sudarshan Chopra and ors. Vs. Vijay Kumar Chopra and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Apr-24-2002

Reported in: [2003]117CompCas660(P& H)

..... apposite application to the facts and circumstances of the present case section 76 of the trade marks act confers a right of appeal to ..... court being seized as such of the appellate jurisdiction conferred by section 76 it has to exercise that jurisdiction in the same manner as ..... the course of the proceedings in company petition no 76 of 1999 under sections 397 and 398 of the companies act 1956 and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 11 2002 (HC)

Babu Gangaram Choudhari and ors. Vs. M.R. Deshpande and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jun-11-2002

Reported in: 2002(4)ALLMR70; 2002(6)BomCR77

..... is that the revisional tribunal has completely exceeded its authority under section 76 of the act and has also transgressed the scope of ..... wrong a priori the tribunal in its revisional jurisdiction under section 76 of the act could not have interfered with the same ..... by private secretary of this court tenancy land purchased sections 32 g and 76 of bombay tenancy and agricultural lands act 1948 and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //