Section 66d Of The 1994 Act - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: section 66d of the 1994 act Year: 2014 Page 1 of about 562 results (0.455 seconds)indus Towers Ltd. Vs. Cit and ors.
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-31-2014
..... 65b 44 of the said act defines service as any activity carried out by a person for ..... finance act 1994 as amended w ef 01 07 2012 12 on the value of all services other than those services specified in the negative list as specified under section 66d of the said act section .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDattu Dagadu Bhagat and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Feb-07-2014
the said act is on par with an award under section 11 of the said act and therefore the interest as and ors v state of u p dated 4 10 1994 rendered in c a nos 563 94 and batch and way of interest payable under section 34 of the said act at the rate of 15 per annum on the entire
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S Fiitjee Limited and Others Vs. Miss Dupaguntla Vaishnavi
Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on : Feb-19-2014
compliance four weeks consumer protection act 1986 euro rdquo section 2 1 g section 15 euro rdquo cases referred engineering colleve vs sushant yuvraj rode and anr reported in 1994 3 cpr 194 9 k siva prasad vs y krishna in the appeal time for compliance four weeks consumer protection act 1986 euro rdquo section 2 1 g section 15
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIndia Info Line Commodities Ltd. and Anothrr Vs. Jagu Srinivasa Rao
Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
Decided on : Feb-12-2014
industrial institute supra revision petition allowed consumer protection act 1986 section 2 1 d section 21 b cases referred 1 laxmi again in morgan stanley mutual fund v kartick das ii 1994 cpj 7 sc 1994 4 scc 225 the question was livelihood is not enough the word consumer in the cp act clearly lays down that the consumer does not include a
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRam Avatar Meena Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Aug-26-2014
respondent in exercise of powers under sub section 1 of section 3 of the conservation of foreign exchange and prevention of dated 25th august 1994 in criminal appeal no 305 of 1994 smt jyoti nandlal manglani vs state of maharashtra and ors alleged against the petitioner we find that the said prejudicial activities alleged are of the date much before the order of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDr. Shivaji Asraji Kamble Vs. State of Maharashtra
Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
Decided on : Aug-04-2014
made absolute in the above terms criminal procedure code 1973 section 227 228 indian penal code 1860 section 312 313 and pre natal diagnostic techniques prohibition of sex selection act 1994 and the medical termination of pregnancy act 1971 3 the conception and pre natal diagnostic techniques prohibition of sex selection act 1994 and the medical termination of pregnancy act 1971 3
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDr. Ramcharan Thiagarajan Vs. Medical Council of India and Others
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Apr-03-2014
consent in effect the petitioner has failed to comply with section 12 of the hota which is a mandatory provision relevant e g r v criminal injuries compensation board v gambles 1994 p i q r 314 cicbs reasons contained a defect impose the punishment in question point no ii the imc act contemplates the maintenance of a register of medical practitioners known
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited India Insurance Company Ltd., Through Its Divisional Manager Vs ...
Court : Himachal Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Shimla
Decided on : Jan-09-2014
party in this background of the case present complaint under section 12 of the consumer protection act had been filed seeking and oriental insurance company limited vs rohit kumar gupta 1 1994 cpj 196 nc there is no dispute about the legal filed a complaint under section 12 of the consumer protection act 1986 before the forum below but the same was united
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDr. Dattatraya Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Another
Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
Decided on : May-09-2014
in the court of judicial magistrate first class rahata under section 29 rule 9 4 of the act alleging that there to proceed in the light of provisions of this act 1994 and rules 1996 this court cannot before holding of trial maintenance of the records thus breach of sections of the act and rules was alleged the judicial magistrate first class rahata
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRohit Ramesh Doshi Vs. State of Maharashtra through Additional Chief S ...
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Nov-07-2014
is held to be a vital document and even if section 5a of the cofeposa is held as not applicable the para 7 9 attorney general for india v amratlal prajivandas 1994 5 scc 54 1994 scc cri 1325 para 11 10 has relied upon statements under section 108 of the customs act 1962 of said vishal madan surendra kumar pandey and pal
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT