Section 6501 - Judgment Search Results

Badaracco Vs. Commissioner

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the united states court of appeals for the third circuit syllabus section 6501 a of the internal revenue code of 1954 establishes a general ..... who fraudulently fails to file any return at all cannot prevail section 6501 c 3 which provides that in a case of failure to ..... filed false or fraudulent returns with the intent to evade tax section 6501 c 1 with its unqualified language then allows the tax to .....

United States Vs. Galletti

Court: US Supreme Court

..... march 23 2004 justice thomas delivered the opinion of the court section 6501 a of the internal revenue code states that except as otherwise ..... we granted certiorari 539 u s 2003 and now reverse ii section 6501 a of the internal revenue code provides that the amount of ..... partner can be a taxpayer the inquiry does not end there section 6203 speaks of the liability of the taxpayer emphasis added which .....

United States Vs. Home Concrete and Supply, Llc

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 2 ca1 2001 whether colony s main holding carries over to section 6501 e 1 is at least doubtful having worked no change in ..... nbsp we reproduce the applicable sections of the two relevant versions of the u s code below section 6501 was amended and reorganized in ..... best read to include overstatements of basis and because neither the section s structure nor its history and context removes this ambiguity .....

Bufferd Vs. Commissioner

Court: US Supreme Court

..... at the time a deficiency notice was issued the period for assessment had expired under section 6501 a is that of petitioner against whom respondent has determined a deficiency citing fehlhaber 94 ..... of completeness is sufficient to establish the corporate return as the return of 6501 a 529 to s corporations section 6012 a 2 requires both subchapter c and subchapter s corporations to .....

The Colony, Inc. Vs. Commissioner

Court: US Supreme Court

..... estate of gibbs v commissioner 21 t c 443 footnote 3 sec 6501 limitations on assessment and collection e omission from gross income except ..... a report of a house ways and means subcommittee as follows section 276 provides for the assessment of the tax without regard to ..... b waiver where before the expiration of the time prescribed in section 275 for the assessment of the tax both the commissioner and .....

Nihal Chand Rameshwar Dass and anr. Vs. Vinod Rastogi and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1994(4)SC113; (1995)109PLR298; 1994(2)SCALE967; (1994)4SCC325; 1994(2)LC181(SC)

dismissed there shall however be no order as to costs section 7 dr arijit pasayat d k jain dr mukundakam sharma

V. Gangaram Vs. Regional Joint Director and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1997SC2776; JT1997(5)SC385; 1997(4)SCALE92; (1997)6SCC139; [1997]3SCR1043

hardship 8 the appeal is accordingly disposed of no costs section 11 s b sinha dr mukundakam sharma jj res judicata

Malhotra Steel Syndicate Vs. Punjab Chemi-plants Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: I(1993)BC177(SC); 1993Supp(3)SCC565

allowed accordingly there will be no order as to costs section 11 s b sinha dr mukundakam sharma jj res judicata

Ved Prakash Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1988SC77; 1988(36)BLJR77; JT1987(4)SC121; 1988LabIC331; 1987(2)SCALE795a; (1987)4SCC584; 1988(1)LC169(SC)

retire the petitioner the special leave petition therefore is dismissed section 6 dr arijit pasayat asok kumar ganguly jj suit for

State of Haryana Vs. Naresh Kumar Bali

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1994(4)SC184; (1995)IILLJ108SC; 1994(2)SCALE1105; (1994)4SCC448; 1994(2)LC226(SC)

have indicated above accordingly the appeal is allowed no costs section 6 dr arijit pasayat asok kumar ganguly jj suit for