Skip to content


Section 617 Of The Companies Act - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: section 617 of the companies act Year: 1992 Page 1 of about 309 results (0.447 seconds)
Jun 29 1992 (HC)

Dinesh Kumar Behera Vs. Orissa Sponge Iron Ltd. and anr.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Jun-29-1992

Reported in : 74(1992)CLT752; (1992)ILLJ419Ori

..... are also owned by several corporate bodies the company is a non government company and not a government company in terms of section 617 of the companies act 1956 it does not enjoy any monopoly status ..... central government and or state governments the company is a non government company and not a government company in terms of section 617 of the companies act 1956 it does not enjoy any monopoly .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 07 1992 (TRI)

Director-general of Vs. Cement Corporation of Gujarat

Court : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Decided on : Feb-07-1992

Reported in : (1994)80CompCas15NULL

..... gujarat and the respondent being a subsidiary would be a government company under section 617 of the companies act 1956 some shares of the respondent company were issued to the public in the year 1987 88 ..... no doubt the respondent could be said to have been a government company within the meaning of section 617 of the companies act 1956 but from 1987 onwards the respondent admittedly ceased to be a .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 03 1992 (HC)

Smt. Farrel Futado Vs. State of Goa and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-03-1992

Reported in : 1993(2)BomCR561; [1994]80CompCas659(Bom)

..... it is not in dispute that respondent no 2 corporation is a government company as defined under section 617 of the companies act it is not in dispute that the government is the majority shareholder ..... petition fails rules is discharge with no order as to costs company removal of director sections 268 274 284 408 and 617 of companies act 1956 and articles 68 1 68 4 and 226 of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 24 1992 (HC)

Dhara Gram Sewa Sehkari Samiti Limited Vs. Indian Farmers Fertilizers ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-24-1992

Reported in : 1992WLN(UC)442

..... or agency of the state which has assumed the garb of a government company as defined in section 617 of the companies act it does not follow that it thereby ceases to be an instrumentality ..... west bengal and assam the corporation was not only a government company as defined by section 617 of the companies act 1956 but was a company wholly owned by the central government and two state governments .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 24 1992 (HC)

Damodar Valley Corporation Vs. B.N. Biswas and Co. Pvt. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-24-1992

Reported in : (1994)1CALLT68(HC)

..... or agency of the state which has assumed the garb of a government company as denned in section 617 of the companies act it does not follow that it thereby ceases to be an instrumentality ..... constitution the central inland water transport corporation ltd is not only a government company as defined in section 617 of the companies act but is wholly owned by the central govt and two state govts .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 30 1992 (HC)

M and N Publications Ltd. and anr. Vs. Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-30-1992

Reported in : 49(1993)DLT380; 1992(24)DRJ484

..... four respondents first respondent mahanagar telephone nigam limited mtnl is a government company within the meaning of section 617 of the companies act 1956 second and third residents are respectively united india periodicals ltd uip ..... the position mr ramaswamy admitted that mtnl in the whole deal may not have acted as a model company and some leniency appeared to have been shown and it could even be .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 19 1992 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Karamchand Premchand Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-19-1992

Reported in : (1992)107CTR(Guj)340; [1993]200ITR281(Guj)

..... local authority a corporation established by a central state or provincial act or a government company as defined in section 617 of the companies act 1956 1 of 1956 or in connection with any amalgamation ..... or succession referred to in sub section 3 or sub section 4 of section 33 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 16 1992 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. East India Charitable Trust

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jan-16-1992

Reported in : [1994]206ITR152(Cal)

..... or by a state government vii investment or deposit in any government company as defined in section 617 of the companies act 1956 1 of 1956 viii deposits with or investment in any bonds ..... bank constituted under section 3 of the banking companies acquisition and transfer of undertakings act 1970 5 of 1970 or under section 3 of the banking companies acquisition and transfer of undertakings act 1980 40 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 21 1992 (HC)

Kumari A.B. Shanthi (Alias) Vennira Adai Nirmala Vs. Assistant Directo ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-21-1992

Reported in : [1992]197ITR330(Mad)

..... bank c any corporation established by a central state or provincial act d any government company as defined in section 617 of the companies act 1956 1 of 1956 e such other institution association or ..... said provision infringes article 14 thus ultra vires head note income tax constitutional validity sec 269ss of it act receipt in violation of s 269ss prosecution under s 276dd borrower alone liable to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 12 1992 (HC)

Hanmant Janardhan Patil Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-12-1992

Reported in : 1993(2)BomCR286; 1993CriLJ3042; 1993(1)MhLj511

..... under a central provincial or state act or a government company as defined in s 617 of the companies act 1956 1 of 1956 mr pradhan ..... the prosecution that even if the charges under the corruption act and under section 409 of i p c fail that the remaining ..... meaning of s 21 of the indian penal code undoubtedly the section unequivocally states that the accused shall be categorised as public servants .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //