Section 617 Of The Companies Act - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: section 617 of the companies act Sorted by: recent Year: 1966 Page 1 of about 303 results (0.228 seconds)Advocate General, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad Vs. Abbaraju Ramarao
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Dec-30-1966
Reported in : AIR1968AP207; 1968CriLJ888
committing incidental offences punishable under section 217 section 218 and section 219 i p c in addition to section 471 i not necessary to prove affirmatively that there has been an actual interference with the administration of justice by reason of such
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri Ramadas Motor Transport Private Ltd. Vs. Vijayawada Municipality R ...
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Dec-30-1966
Reported in : AIR1968AP160
under this act by the amending act x of 1930 section 92 was omitted and section 93 was recast the new before the present amendment liable for what was then termed companies tax section 93 expressly exempted individual members from taxation in andh pra regarding section 65 of the madras village panchayats act 1950 madras act 10 of 1950 which was substantially similar
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJ.V. Krishnaiah and ors. Vs. Sub Collector, Gudur and anr.
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Dec-27-1966
Reported in : AIR1968AP83; 1968CriLJ294
the arrest of a person for recovery of amounts under sections 48 and 49 of the madras revenue recovery act does any specific act authorises the collections under the revenue recovery act the collector has to collect through his officers and servants
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPraga Tools Corporation Ltd. Vs. M.R. Patny and ors.
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Dec-27-1966
Reported in : AIR1968AP320
under section 38 of the indian companies act corresponding to section 35 of the english companies act section 38 1 and indian companies act corresponding to section 35 of the english companies act section 38 1 and 2 of the indian companies 1862 which corresponds to section 38 of the indian companies act 1913 was she contends as obiter dicta inasmuch as only
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri Harindar Singh Vs. Wealth Tax Officer, a Ward, Bhatinda and ors.
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Dec-23-1966
Reported in : AIR1968P& H353; [1967]64ITR394(P& H)
to a division bench cannot be accepted the newly incorporated section 100a in clear and specific terms prohibits further appeal against the meaning of section 2 m of the wealth tax act 1957 5 the various authorities cited above disclose a sharp
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDuana Moliko and anr. Vs. Bhagabat Biso and ors.
Court : Orissa
Decided on : Dec-23-1966
Reported in : AIR1967Ori110; 33(1967)CLT688; 1967CriLJ1036
to be in possession in a summary proceeding under that section 12 in a case reported in air 1917 pat 220 each party to bear his own costs throughout motor vehicles act 1988 c a no 59 1988 section 173 1 proviso
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTV. Ramiah Vs. the State Bank of India by Its Secretary and Treasurer
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Dec-23-1966
Reported in : (1967)2MLJ519
from the question whether miss scott was a workman under section 2 s of the industrial disputes act 1947 the power under contract or enforcing an obligation under contract it is acting purely like a private individual this criterion of distinction is
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRamiah (V.) Vs. State Bank of India
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Dec-23-1966
Reported in : (1968)IILLJ424Mad
from the question whether miss soott was a workman under section 2 s of the industrial disputes act 1947 the power matter is at an and the authority was bound to act quasi judicially and in conformity with the rules framed by
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCherian Lukose Vs. State of Kerala
Court : Kerala
Decided on : Dec-23-1966
Reported in : AIR1968Ker60; 1968CriLJ168
doubt the burden of proof lying upon the accused under section 4 1 of the act will be satisfied if he is one thing to tempt a suspected offender to overt action when he is doing all he can to commit a
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRabinder Nath Malik Vs. Regional Passport Officer, New Delhi and ors.
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-23-1966
Reported in : AIR1967Delhi1
incidental to that purpose by way of illustration in sub section 2 of this section the rules may a prohibit the with which they must comply for the purposes of the act and c provide for the exemption either absolutely or on
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT