Section 617 Of The Companies Act - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: section 617 of the companies act Court: mumbai Year: 1967 Page 1 of about 165 results (0.242 seconds)Zainab Bai and ors. Vs. Navayug Chitrapat Co. Ltd.
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Dec-16-1967
Reported in : AIR1969Bom194; (1968)70BOMLR390; ILR1969Bom315
of the indian companies act 1913 corresponds to the present section 446 and section 232 of the old act corresponds to necessitate any fresh leave under section 446 1 of the companies act 1956 for the same reasons there is no impediment as they are not a part of the cause of action of the landlord the landlord sets out these grounds in
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTZainab Bai, Wife of Hussainbhai Ebrahim and ors. Vs. Navayug Chitrapat ...
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Dec-16-1967
Reported in : [1969]39CompCas735(Bom)
of rent and have not complied with a notice under section 12 2 of the bombay rent act the claim of validity deceased was a very wealthy person he floated several companies he left behind his daughters s and j he was 13 of bombay rents hotel and lodging house rates control act 1947 suit for ejectment application for amendment of plaint adding
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTOfficial Liquidator Vs. V.M. Deshpande and anr.
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Sep-28-1967
Reported in : [1968]38CompCas26(Bom)
case has occurred there per incuriam in so far as section 446 2 is an empowering provision which confers an overriding to be within the scope of section 171 of the companies act 1913 it must be 1 in the nature of been taken under a special act like the income tax act which is a complete code in itself and under which
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTManna Ramji and Co. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Poona
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Feb-11-1967
Reported in : [1967]65ITR542(Bom)
at page 408 as follows business is dealt with under section 10 and the primary condition of the application of the a case where mutual trade agreements were rescinded between two companies and pounds 4 50 000 were paid to the assessee of the appellants profit making apparatus they regulated the appellant activities defined what they might and what they might not do
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax, Bombay City I Vs. Associated Cement Co. Lt ...
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Oct-05-1967
Reported in : [1968]68ITR478(Bom)
has pointed to the words of sub section 1 of section 15b any sums paid by him as donations there is a common sales manager for the assessee and several other companies namely the patiala cement co ltd and the dalmia group for the relief under section 15b of the income tax act must be answered in the affirmative the commissioner will pay
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGeneral Radio and Appliances, Ltd., Bombay Vs. Its Workmen
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Jan-09-1967
Reported in : (1967)IILLJ439Bom
at the shadow it is true that the better organized sections might benefit at the expense of other consumers in the month in the award in the case of associated cement companies 1961 i c r 476 where a similar demand was an item of staff demands 80 the shops and establishments acts of the different states prescribe rules regarding overtime the company
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax, Bombay Vs. Modern Flats Private Ltd.
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Feb-24-1967
Reported in : [1967]65ITR67(Bom)
assessee is liable to be assessed under the provisions of section 9 of the indian income tax act as owner of was next made to section 27a of the specific relief act that section also confers an equitable right of a very
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJivatlal Purtapshi Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Feb-15-1967
Reported in : [1967]65ITR261(Bom)
2 answered in the negative direct taxation jurisdiction of tribunal section 33 of income tax act 1922 statement recorded by appellate direct taxation jurisdiction of tribunal section 33 of income tax act 1922 statement recorded by appellate assistant commissioner that income tax
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNational Umbrella Factory Vs. Sharva Sharmik Sangh and ors.
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Jan-24-1967
Reported in : (1968)ILLJ811Bom
of the respondent 1 union i labour and industrial gratuity section 2 of industrial disputes act 1947 award of tribunal challenged the meaning of s 2 s of the industrial disputes act the objection to this finding must therefore be rejected 8
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAnna Racek Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Feb-17-1967
Reported in : [1967]65ITR221(Bom)
trade or commerce within the meaning of section 2 sub section 4 of the act while on behalf of the assessee if the assessee should have undertake a completely new business activity of this kind within ten days of her husband s
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT