Section 617 Of The Companies Act - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: section 617 of the companies act Court: kolkata Year: 2016 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.273 seconds)Harsh Vardhan Lodha and Ors. Vs. Ajay Kumar Newar and Ors.
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : May-19-2016
..... the provisions contained in section 179 3 and section 180 of the companies act 2013 the powers of the board is defined in section 179 of companies act subsection 3 of section 179 of the companies act provides that the ..... 1 in the case of neodebarni devi vs chamatkarini devi reported in 27 indian cases 617 2 in the case of atula bala dasi vs nirupama devi reported in a i .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Veervani Sales Pvt. Ltd. Vs. M/S. Ritu Beri Designs Pvt. Ltd.
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Nov-02-2016
the plaintiff in the notice dated september 3 2008 under section 434 of the companies act 1956 on november 15 2010 notice dated september 3 2008 under section 434 of the companies act 1956 on november 15 2010 delhi high court directed delhi high court according to ms shroff the cause of action for filing the instant suit arose after november 15 2010
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSurendra Commercial Syndicate Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Pawan Kumar
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Mar-18-2016
april 23 2013 is barred by limitation in view of section 19 of the said act of 1963 that gives a petitioning creditor the statutory notice under section 434 of the companies act 1956 sent by the respondent petitioning creditor to the by residuary article 113 of the schedule to the limitation act for the last date of payment in respect of the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPratyaha News Service Private Limited Vs. Pratidin Prakashani Private ...
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Feb-24-2016
for issuance of requisite notice to the central government under section 394a of the companies act 1956 necessary directions be given one of companies under the umbrella of saradha group of companies bengal media private limited has been used by sudipto sen to the central government under section 394a of the companies act 1956 and publication of advertisement is not accepted the court
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTR.A.V. Dravya (P) Ltd. Vs. Concast Global Ltd.
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Mar-14-2016
related party disclosures ms chakraborty argued that the notices under section 434 of the companies act were received by the respective 19 equity cases 444 sir george jessel said that the companies should have reasonable ground for not paying the debt of proved are enforceable in law section 171 of the contract act which specifically empowers bankers factors wharfingers attorneys of high court
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIsha Distribution House Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Aditya Birla Faashion and Retail ...
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Jul-29-2016
having been served on the company at its registered office section 434 1 a is not attracted the company cannot be its registered office at kolkata section 434 1 of the companies act 1956 provides as follows 434 1 a company shall registered office at kolkata section 434 1 of the companies act 1956 provides as follows 434 1 a company shall be
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGupta Biscuits Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. Vs. The Registrar of Companies, West ...
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Mar-15-2016
the register of companies without following the procedure prescribed under sections 560 1 560 2 560 3 and 560 8 of of the company in the register of the registrar of companies the said company petition was opposed by the registrar of 2 3 and 8 of section 560 of the companies act 1956 mr drolia referred to the judgement of the supreme
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Persis a. Khambatta and Anr. Vs. Industrial Investment Bank of In ...
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Nov-21-2016
misinterpretation of the second limb of the opening part of section 106 of the act and instead of convening a meeting shares stood modified in accordance with section 106 of the companies act 1956 the plaintiffs probably claiming the status of creditors was adopted by all the shareholders section 106 of the act of 1956 has two limbs in its firs part consent
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income Tax, Central I Vs. M/S. Shaw Wallace Distiller ...
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Jun-06-2016
and thereby rendering itself incapable of taking the benefit of section 105 the provisions of the companies act should be read act which reads as follows 1b amalgamation in relation to companies means the merger of one or more companies with another been defined under section 2 1b of the income tax act which reads as follows 1b amalgamation in relation to companies
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTC.I.T., Central Vs. Apeejay Medical Ltd.
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Feb-18-2016
come within the purview of the word institution used in section 10 22a of the act when the legislature has not company can get the benefit of section 25 of the companies act 1956 the benefit is to have the word limited assessee exemption u s 10 22a of the income tax act 1961 2 whether on the facts and in the circumstances
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT