Section 617 Of The Companies Act - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: section 617 of the companies act Court: kolkata Year: 1999 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.251 seconds)Owners and Parties Interested in the Vessel M.V. dong Do and anr. Vs. ...
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Sep-30-1999
Reported in : (2000)1CALLT367(HC)
..... in view the factual back drop involved 9 in india government company is defined in section 617 of the companies act 1956 various government companies have came into being in india but in our opinion despite .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIndian Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. and ors. Vs. the Learned 9th Industrial ...
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Dec-02-1999
Reported in : (2000)2CALLT404(HC),[2000(87)FLR314]
..... on behalf of a central government company by virtue of indian iron and steel company acquisition of shares act 1976 and within the meaning of section 617 of the companies actchallenging the judgment and order of ..... filed by the petitioner company 2a that the state of west bengal is not the appropriate government within the meaning of section 2a of the industrial disputes act 1947 and hence the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Nupur Mitra and anr. Vs. Basubani Pvt. Ltd. and ors.
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Feb-19-1999
Reported in : (1999)2CALLT264(HC),[1999]35CLA97(Cal)
..... the same is taken up at the outset before decision the relevant extract of section 111 of the companies act provides section 111 power to refuse registration and appeal against refusal 1 xxxxx 4 if ..... 1994 com law 617 76 in tracstar investments ltd v gorden woodroffe ltd 1996 87 com case 941 the company law board itself decided the issue of fraud and collusion under section 111 on .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGlucoseries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Deb Kanta Roy
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Mar-01-1999
Reported in : (1999)2CALLT41(HC),1999(1)CHN412
of the share holders at whose instance the application under sections 397 and 398 had been filed to intervene in the three directors were appointed but reading section 235 of the companies act 1956 and article 31 of the company s articles the special officer has got no right to proceed to act in such capacity his tenure was fixed up to the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState Bank of India Vs. S.M. Oil Extraction Pvt. Ltd. and ors.
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Apr-06-1999
Reported in : [2002]108CompCas85(Cal)
have been reserved to the claim of the workers in section 529a of the act 6 in spite of the statute separate legal entity and everything that related or touched the companies according to the supreme court in the decision in industrial interest of the creditors in liquidation proceedings under the companies act he argued that the tribunal had no power to wind
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Ram Kumar Radheshyam Kedia Vs. M/S. Subrata Sasmal and Co. (Pvt.) ...
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Oct-14-1999
Reported in : (2000)1CALLT572(HC)
that the proceedings for winding up under the provisions of sections 433 434 and 349 of the companies act are by up by this hon ble court under the provision of companies act 1956 b cost of the incidental to this application bench held as under from a skeletal scheme of the act summarised and referred to in brevity above and what has
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTManas Kumar Ghosh Vs. T.T.P. Mahmood and anr.
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Jun-18-1999
Reported in : (2000)2CALLT423(HC),[2000(86)FLR898]
of justice but also render ineffective the solutety provision of section 630 the principle enunciated in the said supreme court decision makes out a case triable under section 630 of the companies act the bombay high court decision referred to by the in the year 1993 under section 630 of the companies act 1956 as the criminal proceeding under the said section of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSen and Pandit Electronics (P) Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Apr-23-1999
Reported in : AIR1999Cal293b,(1999)2CALLT488(HC),[2004]49SCL618(Cal)
enlarge the periodof limitation which has been stalutorily prescribed under section 22 of the act it was contended 15 before we above even if there was such a provision in the companies act providing for exclusion of time covered by injunction stay relate to the performance of a duly and the authority acts in neglect of this duty to the detriment of and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Baranagore Jute Factory Plc (In Liquidation) Vs. the Official Liqu ...
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : May-21-1999
Reported in : (1999)2CALLT589(HC)
executive fiat which was without leave of the court under section 446 of the companies act was quite superfluous and the without leave of the court under section 446 of the companies act was quite superfluous and the actual facts and circumstances sub sections 1 and 2 of section 45 of the act are set out herein below 45 power of reserve bank
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTaulis Pharma Ltd. Vs. Bengal Immunity Ltd.
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Aug-30-1999
Reported in : [2002]108CompCas237(Cal)
expedient for the purpose of removing the difficulty 11 sub section 1 of section 22 provides for a valuable right sub placed on corromandal pharmaceuticals case supra 6 the sick industrial companies special provisions act was enacted to make special provision with satya brata sinha actg c j 1 this appeal is directed against the judgment
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT