Section 6012 - Judgment Search Results

Holywell Corp. Vs. Smith

Court: US Supreme Court

..... consider the trustee s duties with respect to the corporate debtors section 6012 b 3 provides quot 3 receivers trustees and assignees for ..... gould s bankruptcy estate the trustee nonetheless must make a return section 6012 b 4 as the debtors assert applies to the fiduciary ..... or a trust within the meaning of sect 6012 b 4 accordingly they assert the section does not require the trustee to file .....

Pennhurst State Sch. and Hosp. Vs. Halderman

Court: US Supreme Court

..... administrative and other appropriate remedies to insure the protection of rights of such persons 6012 a 2 a section 6012 goes on to provide federal aid in establishing such systems page 451 u ..... thus stands in sharp contrast to 6005 6009 6011 and 6012 the enabling parts of the act are the funding sections 42 u s c 6061 6063 1976 ed and supp iii .....

Bufferd Vs. Commissioner

Court: US Supreme Court

..... limitations be treated as a return filed by the corporation under section 6012 3 phyllis bufferd settled separately with the commissioner and is not ..... return as the return of 6501 a 529 to s corporations section 6012 a 2 requires both subchapter c and subchapter s corporations to ..... taxes could be assessed but not to the 8 section 6012 a 2 reads 6012 persons required to make returns of income a general .....

Baral Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... paid on the last day prescribed for filing the return under section 6012 for such taxable year determined without regard to any extension of ..... of these statutorily defined payment dates apply f or purposes of section 6511 the provision directly at issue in this case this means ..... taxpayer the code definitively rejects baral s position in this setting section 6611 d of 26 u s c explains that the date .....

V. Gangaram Vs. Regional Joint Director and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1997SC2776; JT1997(5)SC385; 1997(4)SCALE92; (1997)6SCC139; [1997]3SCR1043

hardship 8 the appeal is accordingly disposed of no costs section 11 s b sinha dr mukundakam sharma jj res judicata

Malhotra Steel Syndicate Vs. Punjab Chemi-plants Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: I(1993)BC177(SC); 1993Supp(3)SCC565

allowed accordingly there will be no order as to costs section 11 s b sinha dr mukundakam sharma jj res judicata

Ved Prakash Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1988SC77; 1988(36)BLJR77; JT1987(4)SC121; 1988LabIC331; 1987(2)SCALE795a; (1987)4SCC584; 1988(1)LC169(SC)

retire the petitioner the special leave petition therefore is dismissed section 6 dr arijit pasayat asok kumar ganguly jj suit for

State of Haryana Vs. Naresh Kumar Bali

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1994(4)SC184; (1995)IILLJ108SC; 1994(2)SCALE1105; (1994)4SCC448; 1994(2)LC226(SC)

have indicated above accordingly the appeal is allowed no costs section 6 dr arijit pasayat asok kumar ganguly jj suit for

The Krishnakumar Mills Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1972)4SCC172; 1971(III)LC278(SC)

is dismissed there will be no order as to costs section 6 dr arijit pasayat asok kumar ganguly jj suit for

Durga Das Vs. the Collector and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1996SC2786; 1996(6)SCALE199; (1996)5SCC618; [1996]Supp4SCR370

be discharged 4 the appeal is accordingly dismissed no costs section 7 dr arijit pasayat d k jain dr mukundakam sharma