Section 55 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: section 55 Sorted by: recent Year: 1931 Page 1 of about 315 results (0.23 seconds)Sheo Pujan Upadhiya and ors. Vs. Bhagwat Prasad Singh and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-23-1931
Reported in: AIR1933All4
view therefore this case does not fulfil the requirements of section 110 civil p c 8 it has next been contended
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRaghunath Prasad and anr. Vs. Jwala Prasad and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-23-1931
Reported in: AIR1932All539
perfectly clear from the language of the last paragraph of section 15 of the act we dismiss this appeal with costs
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSecy. of State Vs. (Chowdhury) Biswambhur Das, Prohoraj Mahapatra and ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-22-1931
Reported in: AIR1932Cal638
that the commissioner was purporting to act under the relevant section of the act is to my mind sufficient to indicate
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Superintendent and Remembrancer of Legal Affairs Vs. Ludur Chandra ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-22-1931
Reported in: AIR1932Cal465,136Ind.Cas.137
the offence the offence is entirely committed within assam and section 188 criminal p c has no application to the case of emperor v govind ram a i r 1924 all 558 the learned judges pointing out that the person who imported
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShantilal Vs. Ram Gopal
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-21-1931
Reported in: 137Ind.Cas.39
abide the result civil procedure code act v of 1908 section 144 restitution decree appointing receiver reversal in appeal right of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGaneshi Lal Vs. Bansi Dhar and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-21-1931
Reported in: AIR1933All84; 140Ind.Cas.181
sen j 1 this is an appeal under section 10 letters patent and arises out of a suit for
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMohammad Abdul Jamil Vs. Manzoor Ahmad and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-21-1931
Reported in: AIR1932All572
made and where section 60 b applies i consider that section 64 applies to a case where there is not a
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShanti Lal Vs. Ram Gopal
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-21-1931
Reported in: AIR1932All239
account of that decree was to apply for restitution under section 144 possession of the factory when the suit was brought
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSundrabai Hanmantrao Kulkarni Vs. Hanmant Gurunath Kulkarni
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-18-1931
Reported in: AIR1932Bom398; (1932)34BOMLR802; 140Ind.Cas.235
presidency the judgments in which are i think relevant under section 42 of the indian evidence act though under that section
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRajendra Nath Kanrar Vs. Kamal Krishna Kundu Chowdhury
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-18-1931
Reported in: AIR1932Cal558
can in any way be regarded as those contemplated by section 14 of the act in order to entitle the appellant
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT