Skip to content

Did you mean: section 2?


Section 52 - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: section 52 Year: 2016 Page 1 of about 21,742 results (0.179 seconds)
Dec 09 2016 (HC)

The Chancellor, Masters & Scholars of University of Oxford & Ors vs.ra ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-09-2016

..... no 81 2016 page 6 of 58 held falling within the ambit of section 52 1 i would render section 52 1 h superfluous was the contention meaning thereby the plaintiffs had required the ..... act and would therefore not be actionable 26 highlighting that different clauses of sub section 1 of section 52 contemplate different copyrighted works learned counsel urged that the same would be apparent from .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 23 2016 (HC)

Myspace Inc. Vs.super Cassettes Industries Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-23-2016

..... internet intermediaries nor does it lay down any special protection except as provided for under section 52 even under section 51 the infringement contemplated is general in the sense that it does not distinguish ..... owner should duly authorize the primary work any transient storage then is exempt under section 52 1 b and 52 1 c scil illustrates this assertion by stating that when cricket matches or .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 28 2016 (HC)

M Narayana Vs. Smt Ramakka

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jan-28-2016

..... right to get himself impleaded in the proceedings having regard to section 52 of the tp act in this connection she has relied on ..... not illegal ipso jure but remains subservient to the pending litigation section 52 of the tp act does not render transfers affected during the ..... it was hit by the doctrine of lis pendens under section 52 of the tp act hence the subsequent purchasers are neither necessary .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 14 2016 (HC)

M/s. Sun TV Network Ltd., Represented by its Managing Director K. Vija ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-14-2016

..... steps to take possession of the land acquired under sub section 5 of section 52 of the act the appellants were entitled to require ..... for quashing the notification issued by the state government under section 52 1 of the act if the respondents felt aggrieved by ..... for quashing the notification issued by the state government under section 52 1 of the act if the respondents felt aggrieved by .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 29 2016 (HC)

Shyamaladevi. A.K., Lakshmidevi Enterprises Vs. The Regional Transport ...

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Mar-29-2016

..... the motor vehicle i have gone through sec 52 of the act sec 52 of the act prohibits an owner of a motor vehicle ..... in the vehicle changes and amounts to material alteration as provided under sec 52 of the motor vehicles act which is not permitted it is ..... to alter the existing brake system in the vehicle it violates sec 52 since the mandate under rule 96 9 is an alteration of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 10 2016 (HC)

G. Madhavan Nair Vs. Union of India, represented by Secretary, Departm ...

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Feb-10-2016

..... on them by the special officer town planning department jaipur under section 52 2 for the grant of an appropriate writ direction or ..... constitution for quashing the notification issued by the state government under section 52 1 of the act if the respondents felt aggrieved by ..... of the notification issued by the state government of rajasthan under section 52 1 of the act by a petition under article 226 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 30 2016 (HC)

Somaiya Organo-Chemicals Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Income Tax Bomba ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Sep-30-2016

..... 7 in k p varghese supra the supreme court was concerned with section 52 of the income tax act as it then applied which provided ..... would accordingly be allowed as deduction whilst computing income under this section ii section 37 was amended in the previous year relevant to a y ..... it would amount to rewriting the section this argument was based on a strictly literal reading of s 52 subs 2 but we do not .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 19 2016 (HC)

Sri Basavaraj @ Madhu Vs. Smt Suvarnamma

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Oct-19-2016

..... of the appeal the said act is 10 prohibited by operation of section 52 of the transfer of property act 1882 to deal with the ..... would be hit by the doctrine of lis pendence by operation of section 52 of the transfer of property act 1882 15 the hon ble ..... vs manik roy and others reported in air2007sc1332 held as under 11 section 52 postulates a condition that the alienation will in no manner affect .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 20 2016 (HC)

Kalaivani @ Devasena Vs. Ramu and Others

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-20-2016

..... place it on record that the principle of lis pendens embodied in section 52 of the t p act being a principle of public policy no ..... question of good faith or bona fide arises the principle underlying section 52 is that a litigating party is exempted from taking notice of a ..... 5th plaintiff and the respondents 2 to 5 plaintiffs 1 to 4 section 52 of t p act is a substantive law whereas the provisions of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 22 2016 (HC)

Suguna Vs. Subramani and Another

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-22-2016

..... court cases 539 sarvinder singh v dalip singh and others 6 section 52 of the transfer of property act envisages that during the ..... that the defendants in the suit were prohibited by operation of section 52 to deal with the property and could not transfer or ..... be hit by the doctrine of lie pendens by operation of section 52 under these circumstances the respondents cannot be considered to be either .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //