Section 514 - Judgment Search Results

ingersoll-rand Co. Vs. Mcclendon

Court: US Supreme Court

..... american samoa guam wake island and the canal zone 29 u s c 1002 10 section 514 c 2 expands rather than restricts that definition for preemption purposes in order to include ..... cause of action in this case is preempted by 514 a is supported by our understanding of the purposes of that provision section 514 a was intended to ensure that plans and plan .....

Fmc Corp. Vs. Holliday

Court: US Supreme Court

..... welfare benefit plans 62 geo l j 339 340 1973 footnote 2 4 section 514 b 2 b as set forth in 29 u s c 1144 b ..... insurance contracts banks trust companies or investment companies emphasis added footnote 2 5 section 514 b 2 a of erisa as set forth in 29 u s c ..... law of any state which regulates insurance 514 b 2 a 29 u s c 1144 b 2 a emphasis added section 1720 directly controls the terms of insurance .....

Madan Mohan Malviya Engineering College Society and anr. Vs. K.N. Sriv ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1998)3UPLBEC2022

the text below is only a summarized version of the order pronouncedrespondent appointed to temporary post against leave vacancy appointment...

Rutan Vs. Republican Party

Court: US Supreme Court

also branti supra 445 u s at 445 u s 514 516 the court then decided that the government interests generally

Ohio Vs. Akron Center

Court: US Supreme Court

..... ann 2919 12 1987 and created 2151 85 and 2505 073 supp 1988 section 2919 12 b the cornerstone of this legislation makes it a criminal ..... see app 18 they conclude as did those page 497 u s 514 courts that h b 319 does not satisfy the bellotti plurality s ..... at both the trial and appellate levels ante at 497 u s 514 the majority disregards the limited nature of the ashcroft holding the court .....

Saffle Vs. Parks

Court: US Supreme Court

the individual offender or the circumstances page 494 u s 514 of the particular offense excludes from consideration in fixing the

Guidry Vs. Sheet Metal Workers

Court: US Supreme Court

..... sheet metal workers local unions and councils pension fund footnote 3 section 501 c provides any person who embezzles steals or unlawfully and ..... will not be modified impaired or superseded in violation of erisa 514 d s saving clause if erisa pension plans cannot be used ..... to effectuate the lmrda s remedial goals a broad reading of 514 d would eviscerate 206 d s protections by rendering 206 d .....

Divisional Engineer, Telecom Vs. Vidyasagar

Court: Karnataka State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC

..... another telephone bearing no 23160 could be referred to arbitration under section 7 b of the indian telegraphs act we are of the ..... singh v divisional engineer telephones current civil cases iii 1990 1 514 urged that the disconnection of telephone no 20160 is illegal and ..... sardar santokh singh v divisional engineer current civil case iii 1990 514 2 s thangam v the area manager south madras telephones .....

Boyde Vs. California

Court: US Supreme Court

the instruction id 442 u s at 442 u s 514 emphasis added because we had no way of knowing that

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Travancore Titanium Products Ltd. (No. ...

Court: Kerala

Reported in: [1991]189ITR653(Ker)

of the decision of the supreme court in 79 itr 514 the asses see is entitled to claim deduction of the