Section 5 Of The Tad Abut Also Under - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: section 5 of the tad abut also under Page 1 of about 600 results (4 seconds)Govind Ram and ors. Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and ors.
Court : Delhi
Reported in : 1993IIIAD(Delhi)31; 51(1993)DLT67
..... the indian penal code section 25 of the arms act and section 132 of the customs act ..... not make section 5 applicable however what we can ill afford to ignore is that the petitioners have been arrested not only under section 5 of the tad abut also under section 120 b read with section 420 of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAbraham Mathai Vs. Sub-collector (Land Acq. Officer) and ors.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : JT1990(3)SC337; 1990(2)KLT349(SC); 1990(2)SCALE159; (1990)4SCC136; [1990]3SCR535; 1990(2)LC445(SC)
land which has been notified under sub section 1 of section 3 or make different reports in respect of different parcels as required under section 5 of the act and rule 5 b c and 6 of the rules framed under the has not been any infringement of rule 6 it has also been held that it is inappropriate to issue notice to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShyam Lal Etc. Vs. State of Rajashtan
Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : 2009CriLJ1803
on 4 10 2000 gave verbatim the same information under section 27 evidence act on 5 10 2000 that he not and got ft recovered for which recovery memo ex p 52 was prepared on 5 10 2000 kewal chand also gave deedwana much before the accused appellants were arrested it is also submitted that the recovery of jack of the jeep at
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShyam Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : RLW2009(2)Raj1698
with one accused kewal chand were charged for offences under sectionsf364 302 394 and section 201 ipc appellant shyam lai and them is false it is interesting that these witnesses pw 5 amin khani pw 6 murad khan and pw 7 saddique in the present case there is no positive motive and also there is no positive evidence about the probable time of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKishindas Tekchand Vs. the State
Court : Mumbai
Reported in : AIR1956Bom423; 1956CriLJ724
discharged 3 application rejected the applicant was being prosecuted under section 441 of the penal code on the ground that he that the petitioner moved this court for stay and on 5 7 1954 the rule issued in favour of the petitioner appropriately dealt with by the civil court besides we have also been influenced by the conduct of the petitioner himself as
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Wealth Tax Vs. Kashi Ram Lila and ors.
Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : (1980)15CTR(Raj)19
the enactment of the juvenile justice act 2000 that in section 2 k a juvenile or child was defined to mean and challan for the amount of penalty of rs 7 500 as determined by the commr the assessee thereupon preferred an time of passing the order for re assessment the wto also initiated penalty proceedings u s 18 1 c of the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEnron Oil and Gas India Ltd. Vs. Sylvia James Nazereth and anr.
Court : Mumbai
Reported in : [2000(84)FLR154]; (2000)IIILLJ373Bom
arrest or order any person to arrest the offender under section 44 of the code that power is vested in the of this petition to the respondent workmen quantified at rs 5000 certified copy expedited code of criminal procedure 1973 c a acknowledgment on behalf of the company the company seal is also not clearly visible from the material as recorded it is
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJam Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : 1993CriLJ2572
the injured on this information a case was registered under sections 452 424 34 and 504 i p c the accused a case was registered under sections 452 424 34 and 504 i p c the accused was arrested the injured was petitioner preferred this revision before this court the prosecution has also failed to prove that the accused has committed an offence
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHarish Chandra Vs. Mohan Kanwar
Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : 1976WLN(UC)475
the enactment of the juvenile justice act 2000 that in section 2 k a juvenile or child was defined to mean not suffer from any infirmity and bat to be upheld 5 i may note that the appeal is also likely to appellant and held that the plaintiffs are the landlords he also held that the plaintiffs were entitled to arrears of rent
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState Vs. D. Sequeira
Court : Mumbai
Reported in : AIR1956Bom414; 1956CriLJ721
the sub inspector was a report within the meaning of section 173 of the code and it was not a complaint there is some breach in exercise of power s 132 5 such breach is not so fatal as to warrant quashing a magistrate under section 155 criminal p c he can also submit a charge sheet or a report in our view
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT