Section 4270 - Judgment Search Results

The Strathairly

Court: US Supreme Court

..... limit be fined 50 and may also be imprisoned for not exceeding six months section 4270 is as follows sec 4270 the amount of the several penalties imposed by the foregoing provisions regulating the ..... vessel by rev stat 167 4203 for a violation of that and the preceding section is by 167 4270 made a lien upon the vessel itself which may be recovered by a .....

The Scow 6-s

Court: US Supreme Court

..... prescribed fines and penalties against the master and owner of the vessel violating such provisions section 4270 provided the amount of the several penalties imposed by the foregoing provisions regulating the ..... be punishable as provided in 1 and in addition have his license revoked or suspended section 4 contains provisions for disposal of dredged material and a penalty for violation thereof .....

MarvIn Vs. Trout

Court: US Supreme Court

..... that question the judgments of the supreme court of ohio are affirmed sec 4270 if any person by playing at any game or by means of ..... person losing such money or thing of value as provided in section 4270 does not within the time therein specified without collusion or deceit ..... in regard to gambling known as 4270 4273 and 4275 of the revised statutes of that state the sections are set forth in the margin .....

Managing Director, Orissa Construction Corpn. and ors. Vs. Shyam Sunda ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1992(II)OLR515

in the above terms with no order as to costs section 7 dr arijit pasayat d k jain dr mukundakam sharma

Malhotra Steel Syndicate Vs. Punjab Chemi-plants Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: I(1993)BC177(SC); 1993Supp(3)SCC565

allowed accordingly there will be no order as to costs section 11 s b sinha dr mukundakam sharma jj res judicata

Ved Prakash Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1988SC77; 1988(36)BLJR77; JT1987(4)SC121; 1988LabIC331; 1987(2)SCALE795a; (1987)4SCC584; 1988(1)LC169(SC)

retire the petitioner the special leave petition therefore is dismissed section 6 dr arijit pasayat asok kumar ganguly jj suit for

State of Haryana Vs. Naresh Kumar Bali

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1994(4)SC184; (1995)IILLJ108SC; 1994(2)SCALE1105; (1994)4SCC448; 1994(2)LC226(SC)

have indicated above accordingly the appeal is allowed no costs section 6 dr arijit pasayat asok kumar ganguly jj suit for

The Krishnakumar Mills Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1972)4SCC172; 1971(III)LC278(SC)

is dismissed there will be no order as to costs section 6 dr arijit pasayat asok kumar ganguly jj suit for

Durga Das Vs. the Collector and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1996SC2786; 1996(6)SCALE199; (1996)5SCC618; [1996]Supp4SCR370

be discharged 4 the appeal is accordingly dismissed no costs section 7 dr arijit pasayat d k jain dr mukundakam sharma

Nihal Chand Rameshwar Dass and anr. Vs. Vinod Rastogi and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1994(4)SC113; (1995)109PLR298; 1994(2)SCALE967; (1994)4SCC325; 1994(2)LC181(SC)

dismissed there shall however be no order as to costs section 7 dr arijit pasayat d k jain dr mukundakam sharma