Section 426 - Judgment Search Results

Jyotiben Ramlal Purohit and Etc. Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: 1997CriLJ1549; (1996)1GLR395

..... held limited in view of the words of section 401 now section 432 of 1973 code and section 426 now section 389 of 1973 code the supreme court ..... as under they can be harmonised without any difficulty if section 426 is held to deal with a special case restricted to the ..... while the court is seized of the same matter under section 426 thus from this judgment it is very clear that the powers .....

Madan Mohan Sahoo and anr. Vs. State of Orissa

Court: Orissa

Reported in: 1996CriLJ1169

..... of the essential commodities act 1955 in short the act section 426 of the indian penal code 1860 in short the ipc ..... it is to be noticed that the proviso to sub section i of section 439 dealing with serious crimes expressly provides for giving notice to ..... of judicial forums i the state of punjab 1980crilj1125 sub section 1 of section 438 lays down a condition which has to be satisfied before .....

Jyothi Home Industries Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: [1995(71)FLR706]; ILR1995KAR1922; 1995(5)KarLJ100; (1996)IIILLJ105Kant

..... and thereby has exposed himself as liable to be punished under section 426 i p c likewise sri damodar by obstructing the movement ..... andhra pradesh high court while considering the expression lesser punishment in section 11a of the industrial disputes act justice ramaswamy as he ..... the goods and persons has committed the offences punishable under sections 341 342 i p c in such circumstances these acts .....

State of A.P. Vs. S. Vishwanatha Raju and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1995(2)SC528; 1995(1)SCALE855; (1995)3SCC327; [1995]1SCR529

order1 heard counsel for thr parties 2 delay of 3 years and 178 days is condoned 3 substitution allowed leave...

Rosenberger Vs. Rector and Visitors of Univ. of VA.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the court fails to confront the evidence set out in the preceding section throughout its opinion the court refers uninformatively to wide awake s ..... institutions see e g roemer v board of public works of md 426 u s 736 747 since it is undisputed that no public ..... though it makes its aid available to secular and religious institutions alike 426 u s at 747 opinion of blackmun j instead the central .....

Hercules, Inc. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... that a promise to indemnify should not be readily inferred 13 section 707 provides in relevant part no person shall be held liable ..... that the government would not be liable under a tort theory 426 as an alternative basis for recovery thompson contends that the context ..... 594 1971 1975 comp indemnification with exec order 10789 3 cfr 426 1954 1958 comp no specific reference to indemnification compare 32 .....

Kyles Vs. Whitley

Court: US Supreme Court

subject of newspaper and television reports see supra at 425 426 for a discussion of further brady evidence to attack the

Adarand Constructors, Inc. Vs. Peandntilde;a

Court: US Supreme Court

..... see e g 16 f 3d at 1544 adarand has stipulated that section 502 of the small business act satisfies the evidentiary requirements of ..... housing development corp 429 u s 252 1977 washington v davis 426 u s 229 1976 adarand s claim arises under the fifth ..... government s constitutional obligation to govern impartially hampton v mow sun wong 426 u s 88 100 1976 should ignore this distinction 1 1 .....

Sathaiah Vs. Smt. Savithri Bai

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1995(2)ALT693

..... and the courts below are wrong in holding to the contrary 4 section 10 2 of the act reads as follows a landlord who seeks ..... portions of the premises bearing nos 4 7 425 and 4 7 426 where two other tenants are staying against whom eviction petitions have been ..... has sufficient accommodation in premises nos 4 7 425 and 4 7 426 is without any basis the evidence on record does not disclose the .....

Gutierrez De Martinez Vs. Lamagno

Court: US Supreme Court

..... states as defendant upon the attorney gener 419 ai s certification section 2679 d 2 states explicitly that certification of the attorney ..... judgment of the attorney general or her delegate pp 425 426 c construction of the westfall act as lamagno urges to ..... the congressional intent that the court finds elusive ante at 425 426 that normal meaning and manifest intent is confirmed by additional .....