Section 4254 - Judgment Search Results

The Strathairly

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the proportion to the space or tonnage prescribed in the preceding section section 4254 authorizes for the safety or convenience of the vessel portions ..... of passengers are 167 167 4252 4253 and 4254 which correspond with the first section of the act of march 3 1855 the ..... on the vessel violating those provisions and in view of that section the vessel is considered and treated as itself violating those .....

The Scotland

Court: US Supreme Court

..... to give the respondents page 105 u s 35 the benefit of sec 4254 which declares that either party may take the appropriate proceedings in ..... out this law are then prescribed one in sec 4284 and the other in sec 4285 by sec 4284 a pro rata recovery against the shipowner ..... mode of attaining the benefit of the law is prescribed by sec 4285 which declares that it shall be deemed a sufficient compliance .....

V. Gangaram Vs. Regional Joint Director and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1997SC2776; JT1997(5)SC385; 1997(4)SCALE92; (1997)6SCC139; [1997]3SCR1043

hardship 8 the appeal is accordingly disposed of no costs section 11 s b sinha dr mukundakam sharma jj res judicata

Malhotra Steel Syndicate Vs. Punjab Chemi-plants Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: I(1993)BC177(SC); 1993Supp(3)SCC565

allowed accordingly there will be no order as to costs section 11 s b sinha dr mukundakam sharma jj res judicata

Ved Prakash Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1988SC77; 1988(36)BLJR77; JT1987(4)SC121; 1988LabIC331; 1987(2)SCALE795a; (1987)4SCC584; 1988(1)LC169(SC)

retire the petitioner the special leave petition therefore is dismissed section 6 dr arijit pasayat asok kumar ganguly jj suit for

State of Haryana Vs. Naresh Kumar Bali

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1994(4)SC184; (1995)IILLJ108SC; 1994(2)SCALE1105; (1994)4SCC448; 1994(2)LC226(SC)

have indicated above accordingly the appeal is allowed no costs section 6 dr arijit pasayat asok kumar ganguly jj suit for

The Krishnakumar Mills Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1972)4SCC172; 1971(III)LC278(SC)

is dismissed there will be no order as to costs section 6 dr arijit pasayat asok kumar ganguly jj suit for

Durga Das Vs. the Collector and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1996SC2786; 1996(6)SCALE199; (1996)5SCC618; [1996]Supp4SCR370

be discharged 4 the appeal is accordingly dismissed no costs section 7 dr arijit pasayat d k jain dr mukundakam sharma

Nihal Chand Rameshwar Dass and anr. Vs. Vinod Rastogi and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1994(4)SC113; (1995)109PLR298; 1994(2)SCALE967; (1994)4SCC325; 1994(2)LC181(SC)

dismissed there shall however be no order as to costs section 7 dr arijit pasayat d k jain dr mukundakam sharma

Managing Director, Orissa Construction Corpn. and ors. Vs. Shyam Sunda ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1992(II)OLR515

in the above terms with no order as to costs section 7 dr arijit pasayat d k jain dr mukundakam sharma