Section 4253 - Judgment Search Results

The Strathairly

Court: US Supreme Court

..... carried by reference to the tonnage and space of the vessel section 4253 declares that whenever the master of any such vessel shall ..... of superficial deck shall be the proportion required for each passenger section 4253 imposes the penalty upon the master for carrying any greater ..... distinguished from the case of the fine imposed by 167 4253 section 4259 also imposes a penalty of 200 upon the master .....

Lee Vs. U.S

Court: US Supreme Court

..... attorney general to determine whether he is an addict likely to be rehabilitated through treatment section 4253 provides that if a court after this study finds that an offender is an addict ..... to their habits shortly after release from prison or voluntary drug addiction programs footnote 3 section 4252 undoubtedly preserves the discretion of the sentencing judge to refuse to apply the provisions .....

V. Gangaram Vs. Regional Joint Director and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1997SC2776; JT1997(5)SC385; 1997(4)SCALE92; (1997)6SCC139; [1997]3SCR1043

hardship 8 the appeal is accordingly disposed of no costs section 11 s b sinha dr mukundakam sharma jj res judicata

Malhotra Steel Syndicate Vs. Punjab Chemi-plants Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: I(1993)BC177(SC); 1993Supp(3)SCC565

allowed accordingly there will be no order as to costs section 11 s b sinha dr mukundakam sharma jj res judicata

Ved Prakash Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1988SC77; 1988(36)BLJR77; JT1987(4)SC121; 1988LabIC331; 1987(2)SCALE795a; (1987)4SCC584; 1988(1)LC169(SC)

retire the petitioner the special leave petition therefore is dismissed section 6 dr arijit pasayat asok kumar ganguly jj suit for

State of Haryana Vs. Naresh Kumar Bali

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1994(4)SC184; (1995)IILLJ108SC; 1994(2)SCALE1105; (1994)4SCC448; 1994(2)LC226(SC)

have indicated above accordingly the appeal is allowed no costs section 6 dr arijit pasayat asok kumar ganguly jj suit for

The Krishnakumar Mills Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1972)4SCC172; 1971(III)LC278(SC)

is dismissed there will be no order as to costs section 6 dr arijit pasayat asok kumar ganguly jj suit for

Durga Das Vs. the Collector and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1996SC2786; 1996(6)SCALE199; (1996)5SCC618; [1996]Supp4SCR370

be discharged 4 the appeal is accordingly dismissed no costs section 7 dr arijit pasayat d k jain dr mukundakam sharma

Nihal Chand Rameshwar Dass and anr. Vs. Vinod Rastogi and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1994(4)SC113; (1995)109PLR298; 1994(2)SCALE967; (1994)4SCC325; 1994(2)LC181(SC)

dismissed there shall however be no order as to costs section 7 dr arijit pasayat d k jain dr mukundakam sharma

Managing Director, Orissa Construction Corpn. and ors. Vs. Shyam Sunda ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1992(II)OLR515

in the above terms with no order as to costs section 7 dr arijit pasayat d k jain dr mukundakam sharma