Section 420 Of The Indian Penal Code 1860 And - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: section 420 of the indian penal code 1860 and Year: 1955 Page 1 of about 303 results (5.55 seconds)K. Krishnamurthy and ors. Vs. the State
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Mar-10-1955
Reported in : 1957CriLJ1216
separate charges against accused 1 2 4 and 5 under section 420 indian penal code and against accused 3 and 6 judge guntur convicting the petitioners six in number under section 420 i p c and sentencing accused 1 to 5 to 3 and 6 under section 420 read with section 511 indian penal code but subsequently the charges under sections 465 and accused under section 120 b read with section 420 indian penal code and sentenced each of them to six months rigorous 147 426 and 325 read with section 149 indian penal code were framed against the accused the conviction was in respect
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLaxmi NaraIn Kalra Vs. the State of Uttar Pradesh
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Nov-25-1955
Reported in : AIR1956SC544; 1956CriLJ948
..... the conviction of the appellant by the two courts below on a charge under section 420 indian penal code in response to a notice dated 4th november 1949 the district development officer etawah ..... stated to have been paid and will be refunded criminal cheating section 420 of indian penal code 1860 appeal against conviction for offence under section 420 appellant drew a cheque of rs 4 000 for security .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe State of Bihar Vs. M. Homi and anr.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Mar-24-1955
Reported in : AIR1955SC478; 1955(0)BLJR467; 1955CriLJ1017; [1955]2SCR78
..... october 1946 whereas one maulavi a ali khan who was convicted under section 120 b read with section 420 indian penal code by the first special tribunal calcutta and sentenced to four years ..... therefore be dismissed in limine 7 appeal dismissed criminal liability of surety sections 120 b and 420 of indian penal code 1860 accused s conviction suspended for filing appeal security deposited and sureties .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJivraj Joharmal Vs. the State
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Dec-13-1955
Reported in : AIR1956Bom719; 1956CriLJ1311
will be set aside 6 order set aside criminal conviction section 411 of indian penal code 1860 and section 57 of aside 6 order set aside criminal conviction section 411 of indian penal code 1860 and section 57 of bombay police act 6 order set aside criminal conviction section 411 of indian penal code 1860 and section 57 of bombay police act 1951 order set aside criminal conviction section 411 of indian penal code 1860 and section 57 of bombay police act 1951 petition set aside criminal conviction section 411 of indian penal code 1860 and section 57 of bombay police act 1951 petition filed
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn Re: Chikka Byre Gowda
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jun-22-1955
Reported in : AIR1955Kant119; AIR1955Mys119; 1955CriLJ1274
act ii 1927 section 6 of act ii of 1927 section 8 a s bopanna j application of the repealing act court 13 appeal allowed criminal circumstantial evidence section 302 of indian penal code 1860 appellant convicted for murder no eye witness 13 appeal allowed criminal circumstantial evidence section 302 of indian penal code 1860 appellant convicted for murder no eye witness to appeal allowed criminal circumstantial evidence section 302 of indian penal code 1860 appellant convicted for murder no eye witness to occurrence allowed criminal circumstantial evidence section 302 of indian penal code 1860 appellant convicted for murder no eye witness to occurrence and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHaveli Ram Vs. the State
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Sep-05-1955
Reported in : AIR1956All132; 1956CriLJ183
not surrender to his bail criminal counterfeiting amp colourable imitation sections 480 482 and 486 of indian penal code 1860 the india ltd is a joint stock company incorporated under the indian companies act they are manufacturers of certain well known brands amp colourable imitation sections 480 482 and 486 of indian penal code 1860 the test is to examine the totality of colourable imitation sections 480 482 and 486 of indian penal code 1860 the test is to examine the totality of the imitation sections 480 482 and 486 of indian penal code 1860 the test is to examine the totality of the impression
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRam Shankar Singh and ors. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Apr-19-1955
Reported in : AIR1956SC441; 1956CriLJ822
under 392 held conviction of appellant set aside appeal allowed section 28 delhi school education rules 1973 rule 123 altamas kabir which i can usefully add criminal dacoity section 395 of indian penal code 1860 appellants convicted for offence dacoity under section i can usefully add criminal dacoity section 395 of indian penal code 1860 appellants convicted for offence dacoity under section 395 can usefully add criminal dacoity section 395 of indian penal code 1860 appellants convicted for offence dacoity under section 395 and usefully add criminal dacoity section 395 of indian penal code 1860 appellants convicted for offence dacoity under section 395 and sentenced
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMt. Rup Devi and anr. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Court : Himachal Pradesh
Decided on : Jan-11-1955
Reported in : 1955CriLJ679
in part i set aside her conviction ofan offence under section 302 read with section 114 i p c instead i is rejected criminal abatement sections 114 201 and 302 of indian penal code 1860 appeal against order convicting g under section rejected criminal abatement sections 114 201 and 302 of indian penal code 1860 appeal against order convicting g under section 302 criminal abatement sections 114 201 and 302 of indian penal code 1860 appeal against order convicting g under section 302 and abatement sections 114 201 and 302 of indian penal code 1860 appeal against order convicting g under section 302 and r
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBallan Vs. the State
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Apr-15-1955
Reported in : AIR1955All626; 1955CriLJ1448
not enact any rule not deducible from the two preceding sections namely sections 299 and 300 i p c but it intentional causing of death sections 304a 299 and 301 of indian penal code 1860 protection of section 304a claimed as act in circumstances such as these death penalty is the only penalty that should be imposed upon the appellant 11 we therefore of death sections 304a 299 and 301 of indian penal code 1860 protection of section 304a claimed as act was negligent death sections 304a 299 and 301 of indian penal code 1860 protection of section 304a claimed as act was negligent knowledge
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRishideo Pande Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Feb-03-1955
Reported in : AIR1955SC331; 1955CriLJ873
the sessions judge of ghazipur on 25 2 1954 under section 302 read with section 34 i p c for having criminal applicability of section 34 sections 302 and 34 of indian penal code 1860 appellant was armed with lathi and his applicability of section 34 sections 302 and 34 of indian penal code 1860 appellant was armed with lathi and his brother of section 34 sections 302 and 34 of indian penal code 1860 appellant was armed with lathi and his brother with section 34 sections 302 and 34 of indian penal code 1860 appellant was armed with lathi and his brother with gandasa
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT