Section 416 - Judgment Search Results

Venkatamma (Decd.) (by Legal Heirs) Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Ka ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: [1979]119ITR298(KAR); [1979]119ITR298(Karn)

srinivasa iyengar j 1 these references relate to the same assessee but for three different assessment years viz 1959 60...

Foley Vs. Connelie

Court: US Supreme Court

386 u s 555 557 1967 cf scheuer v rhodes 416 u s 232 416 u s 245 246 1974 in

Butz Vs. Economou

Court: US Supreme Court

..... a state is adequately protected by a qualified immunity footnote 29 section 1 of the civil rights act of 1871 17 stat 13 ..... from liability under 1983 for violations of constitutionally protected rights 416 u s at 416 u s 246 there the governor of a state ..... absolute immunity for their constitutional transgressions cf scheuer v rhodes 416 u s at 416 u s 248 moreover the government s analysis would place .....

Buchanan Vs. Evans

Court: US Supreme Court

of pervasive de jure inter district segregation evans v buchanan 416 f supp at 343 393 f supp at 432 438

Houchins Vs. Kqed, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 6 see e g behind the bars aba report of young lawyers section on prison visitation program 1970 1975 case citizen participation an experiment in ..... jail officials and reporting on conditions see procunier v martinez 416 u s at 416 u s 413 418 respondents are free to interview those ..... render the legal assistance to which inmates are entitled see id at 416 u s 419 they are also free to seek out former .....

Procunier Vs. Navarette

Court: US Supreme Court

..... congress must have intended to expose state officials to damages liability in some circumstances the section has been consistently construed as not intending wholesale revocation of the common law immunity afforded ..... generally accepted standard for testing the constitutionality of prison mail censorship regulations id at 416 u s 406 416 u s 407 some courts of appeals were said to have maintained a .....

Regents of Univ. of California Vs. Bakke

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of the legislation senator humphrey the senate floor manager opened the senate debate with a section by section analysis of the civil rights act in which he succinctly stated the purpose of ..... inexcusably utilized to stereotype and stigmatize politically powerless segments of society kahn v shevin 416 u s 351 416 u s 357 1974 dissenting opinion while a carefully tailored statute designed to .....

In Re Primus

Court: US Supreme Court

..... from those contacted for the purpose of obtaining their joinder footnote 12 section 4 b of the supreme court of south carolina s rule on ..... because allen an old family friend had invited page 436 u s 416 them and because williams wanted t o see what it was ..... association opinions of the committee on professional ethics formal opinion 148 pp 416 419 1967 footnote 32 normally the purpose or motive of the .....

Flagg Bros., Inc. Vs. Brooks

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the most effective and unambiguous way a state can act this section specifically authorizes petitioner flagg brothers to sell respondents possessions it details ..... facilitate commercial transactions mitchell v w t grant co 416 u s at 416 u s 624 powell j concurring this framework of ..... the deprivation of those interests see arnett v kennedy 416 u s 134 416 u s 153 154 rehnquist j although a majority .....

Carey Vs. Piphus

Court: US Supreme Court

..... problems of fashioning damages awards under 1983 see generally mccormack federalism and section 1983 limitations on judicial enforcement of constitutional protections part 1 60 va ..... 675 430 u s 677 678 682 1977 arnett v kennedy 416 u s 134 416 u s 170 1974 powell j concurring in part and ..... marshall j dissenting mitchell v w t grant co 416 u s 600 416 u s 609 610 416 u s 618 1974 goldberg v kelly 397 .....