Section 4001 - Judgment Search Results

Hamdi Vs. Rumsfeld

Court: US Supreme Court

..... his detention is forbidden by 18 u s c 4001 a section 4001 a states that n o citizen shall be imprisoned ..... or otherwise detained by the united states except pursuant to an act of congress congress passed 4001 ..... that clearly authorized detention or imprisonment second when congress passed 4001 a it was acting in light of an interpretive regime .....

Rumsfeld Vs. Padilla

Court: US Supreme Court

..... padilla as an enemy combatant id at 605 608 footnote 6 section 4001 a provides that n o citizen shall be imprisoned or otherwise ..... b the southern district does not have jurisdiction over commander marr section 2241 a s language limiting district courts to granting habeas ..... person and treat the person in accordance with the provisions of section 3142 release of a material witness may be delayed for .....

Union Pacific Railroad Company Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... to conform its claims and the court of claims so adjudged section 4001 provides that all railway companies to which the united states ..... railroad act is the first of its kind the clause in sec 4001 authorizing the postmaster general to fix the rate of compensation ..... the continued existence of the contract contained in the sixth section of the appellant s charter the legislation referred to furnishes .....

Managing Director, Orissa Construction Corpn. and ors. Vs. Shyam Sunda ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1992(II)OLR515

in the above terms with no order as to costs section 7 dr arijit pasayat d k jain dr mukundakam sharma

Malhotra Steel Syndicate Vs. Punjab Chemi-plants Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: I(1993)BC177(SC); 1993Supp(3)SCC565

allowed accordingly there will be no order as to costs section 11 s b sinha dr mukundakam sharma jj res judicata

Ved Prakash Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1988SC77; 1988(36)BLJR77; JT1987(4)SC121; 1988LabIC331; 1987(2)SCALE795a; (1987)4SCC584; 1988(1)LC169(SC)

retire the petitioner the special leave petition therefore is dismissed section 6 dr arijit pasayat asok kumar ganguly jj suit for

State of Haryana Vs. Naresh Kumar Bali

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1994(4)SC184; (1995)IILLJ108SC; 1994(2)SCALE1105; (1994)4SCC448; 1994(2)LC226(SC)

have indicated above accordingly the appeal is allowed no costs section 6 dr arijit pasayat asok kumar ganguly jj suit for

The Krishnakumar Mills Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1972)4SCC172; 1971(III)LC278(SC)

is dismissed there will be no order as to costs section 6 dr arijit pasayat asok kumar ganguly jj suit for

Durga Das Vs. the Collector and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1996SC2786; 1996(6)SCALE199; (1996)5SCC618; [1996]Supp4SCR370

be discharged 4 the appeal is accordingly dismissed no costs section 7 dr arijit pasayat d k jain dr mukundakam sharma

Nihal Chand Rameshwar Dass and anr. Vs. Vinod Rastogi and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1994(4)SC113; (1995)109PLR298; 1994(2)SCALE967; (1994)4SCC325; 1994(2)LC181(SC)

dismissed there shall however be no order as to costs section 7 dr arijit pasayat d k jain dr mukundakam sharma