Section 353 - Judgment Search Results

Namasivayam Vs. State

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 1982CriLJ707

..... from discharging their duties warranting the petitioner s conviction under section 353 i p c this complaint sent by one of the ..... crime no 332 of 1977 against the petitioner herein under section 353 i p c this complaint was investigated by the inspector ..... on the old complaint filed a charge sheet against petitioner under section 353 i p c before the judicial second class magistrate sankarankoil .....

Tejinder Singh Vs. Bhavi Chand Jindal and Others

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 20(1981)DLT78

..... and they were directed to be tried for offences under sections 353 332 ipc only 4 the senior public prosecutor after remand ..... consequently he has acquitted the accused of charges under sections 353 332 r w section 34 ipc feeling dissatisfied the petitioner has again come ..... bajoria who were sought to be tried for offences under sections 332 353 ipc however respondents sh dharam pal jindal and his .....

Mohammed Vs. State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

Reported in: 1982CriLJ1120

..... that i adopted above in that case the offence involved was under section 353 i p c as seen from the judgment of the trial ..... prosecutor if he appears and in case of an appeal under section 377 or section 378 the accused if he appears the appellate court may ..... a revision under the following circumstances in a prosecution under section 7 1 and section 16 1 of the prevention of food adulteration act 1954 .....

Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: (1981)22CTR(Kar)91; [1981]6TAXMAN264(Kar)

orderchandrakantaraj urs j 1 petitioner hindustan aeronautics limited is an assessee under the it act 1961 hereinafter referred to as...

Plumbers and Pipefitters Vs. Plumbers and Pipefitters

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the federal district courts under 301 a of the labor management relations act 1947 that section establishes such jurisdiction for s uits for violation of contracts between any labor organizations representing ..... collective bargaining process by making collective bargaining agreements enforceable by the judiciary see id at 353 u s 453 456 the court concluded that the remedy fashioned by the district .....

Complete Auto Transit, Inc. Vs. Reis

Court: US Supreme Court

..... as has been pointed out above in the discussion of section 7 and section 8 b 1 of the conference agreement under existing principles ..... which allowed an employer to recover damages from individual employees section 12 created a damages action against any person engaging in ..... 353 u s 457 as informed by its legislative history see howard johnson co v hotel restaurant employees supra at 417 u s 255 section .....

Rhodes Vs. Chapman

Court: US Supreme Court

1978 per curiam see also ante at 452 u s 353 361 brennan j concurring in judgment footnote 3 8 page

Ball Vs. James

Court: US Supreme Court

metropolitan edison co 419 u s 345 419 u s 353 and so is not in itself the sort of general

City of Milwaukee Vs. Illinois

Court: US Supreme Court

..... this case congressman aspin of wisconsin proposed an amendment to 402 sec a section 402 of the federal water pollution control act is amended by ..... the laws of several states textile workers v lincoln mills 353 u s 448 353 u s 456 457 1957 united states v standard oil ..... adopted in illinois to restore and protect illinois page 451 u s 353 waters footnote 2 32 the court of appeals noted that wisconsin .....

Barrentine Vs. Arkansas-best Freight Sys.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... activity or activities b notwithstanding the provisions of subsection a of this section which relieve an employer from liability and punishment with respect to an ..... 363 u s 568 1960 textile workers v lincoln mills 353 u s 448 353 u s 458 59 1957 footnote 10 respondents contend that ..... 593 363 u s 596 1960 textile workers v lincoln mills 353 u s 448 353 u s 458 459 1957 the court today pays lipservice .....