Section 3500 - Judgment Search Results

Goldberg Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... any limitation to statements made to an agent of the government section 3500 e 1 defines a producible statement as one made by ..... claims that any statement ordered to be produced under this section contains matter which does not relate to the subject matter ..... whenever any statement is delivered to a defendant pursuant to this section the court in its discretion upon application of said defendant .....

Campbell Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... a substantially verbatim recital of that which staula told the agents section 3500 e 1 is inapplicable footnote 2 3 aside from staula ..... claims that any statement ordered to be produced under this section contains matter which does not relate to the subject matter ..... any statement is delivered to a defendant pursuant to this section the court in its discretion upon application of said defendant .....

Lev Vs. U S

Court: US Supreme Court

..... determine whether the summary is discoverable under the provisions of title 18 u s c section 3500 when no claim is made that it contained irrelevant or extraneous matter 6 are not ..... to the defendant under the provisions of title 18 u s c section 3500 7 does title 18 u s c section 3500 provide the sole procedure by which such summaries and reports are .....

SmyThe Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... and value when this bond was executed it was provided by section 3500 that every officer of the mint before entering upon the ..... an oath faithfully and diligently to perform the duties thereof by section 3501 that the superintendent before entering upon his office should ..... faithful and diligent performance of the duties of his office by section 3503 that the superintendent of each mint shall have the .....

Coir Board Ernakulam Kerala State and anr. Vs. Indira Devi P.S. and or ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1999)ILLJ1109SC; 1998(6)SCALE288b; (2000)1SCC224

therefore be listed before the appropriate bench for further proceedings section 11 s b sinha dr mukundakam sharma jj res judicata

V. Gangaram Vs. Regional Joint Director and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1997SC2776; JT1997(5)SC385; 1997(4)SCALE92; (1997)6SCC139; [1997]3SCR1043

hardship 8 the appeal is accordingly disposed of no costs section 11 s b sinha dr mukundakam sharma jj res judicata

Malhotra Steel Syndicate Vs. Punjab Chemi-plants Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: I(1993)BC177(SC); 1993Supp(3)SCC565

allowed accordingly there will be no order as to costs section 11 s b sinha dr mukundakam sharma jj res judicata

Ved Prakash Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1988SC77; 1988(36)BLJR77; JT1987(4)SC121; 1988LabIC331; 1987(2)SCALE795a; (1987)4SCC584; 1988(1)LC169(SC)

retire the petitioner the special leave petition therefore is dismissed section 6 dr arijit pasayat asok kumar ganguly jj suit for

State of Haryana Vs. Naresh Kumar Bali

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1994(4)SC184; (1995)IILLJ108SC; 1994(2)SCALE1105; (1994)4SCC448; 1994(2)LC226(SC)

have indicated above accordingly the appeal is allowed no costs section 6 dr arijit pasayat asok kumar ganguly jj suit for

The Krishnakumar Mills Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1972)4SCC172; 1971(III)LC278(SC)

is dismissed there will be no order as to costs section 6 dr arijit pasayat asok kumar ganguly jj suit for