Section 35 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: section 35 Year: 2003 Page 1 of about 38,794 results (0.244 seconds)Commr. of C. Ex., Chandigarh Vs. Smithkline Beecham Co. Health C. Ltd.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-05-2003
Reported in: 2003LC10(SC); 2003(157)ELT497(SC)
..... stands set aside 4 the appeal is accordingly disposed off no order as to costs section 35 g dr arijit pasayat asok kumar ganguly jj appeal delay in filing held delay cannot .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Central Excise Vs. Lloyds Metals and Engineering Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: May-30-2003
Reported in: (2003)(159)ELT1144Tri(Mum.)bai
..... a has rejected the departmental appeal filed on the ground of improper authorisation under section 35 e 2 without considering the merits of the case excisable goods removed clandestinely commissioner ..... commissioner a has rejected the departmental appeal on the ground of improper authorisation under section 35 e 2 without considering the merits of the case commissioner a has rejected the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAssistant Commissioner of Income Vs. Affection Investments Ltd.
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad
Decided on: Feb-19-2003
Reported in: (2003)80TTJ(Ahd.)278
..... with due care and discernment bearing in mind the restricted scope of their jurisdiction under section 35 and the object for what it is conferred each case depends on its own facts ..... time limit for filing an appeal before the hon ble high court under section 260a of the it act 1961 35 after giving our deep and thoughtful consideration to the entire relevant facts .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAlf Engineering Company Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-05-2003
..... 08 98 much after the expiry of the time limit of 3 months prescribed under section 35 of central excise act 1944 for filing of appeals the appellants state that they had ..... provided delay is not on account of culpable negligence and deliberate and malafide intention 1988 35 elt 465 c condonation of delay pragmatic and liberal approach to be taken delay not .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPharmson Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad
Decided on: Jan-10-2003
Reported in: (2003)87ITD668(Ahd.)
..... 100 per cent deduction of the cost thereof under section 35 1 iv r w section 35 2 ia of the act these assets were acquired ..... for acquiring the said assets had already been given under section 35 1 iv r w section 35 2 ia the amount of proceeds on the sale ..... deduction of the entire cost thereof has been allowed under section 35 1 iv r w section 35 2 it being expenditure of capital nature on scientific .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKrishak Bharti Cooperative Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2003
Reported in: (2003)(159)ELT352TriDel
..... their application for condonation of delay on the ground that under section 35 of the central excise act he has power to condone the ..... on merits that under the provisions of law as contained in section 35 of the central excise act the commissioner appeals has been empowered ..... refund claim filed by the appellants as per the provisions of section 35 of the central excise act any person aggrieved by any .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTModern Syntex (i) Ltd. Vs. Cce
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Nov-11-2003
Reported in: (2004)(92)ECC238
..... high court s ruling in jai hind bottling company s case and argued that notwithstanding section 35 of the central excise act the commissioner appeals could have considered the delay condonation application ..... directed that such appeal be entertained by the collector appeals notwithstanding the limitation provisions of section 35 of the central excise amp salt act it is noteworthy that the hon ble .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTG. Baramappa Vs. Kenchappa and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-12-2003
Reported in: AIR2003Kant331; 2003(4)KarLJ289
..... not in possession whether the court fees payable is under section 35 2 or 35 1 of the court fees and suits valuation act 1958 ..... is unnecessary the relief for partition and possession falls under section 35 1 and not section 24 a court fee has to be computed on the ..... petitioner is liable to pay the court fee as provided under section 35 1 of the karnataka court fees and suits valuation act taking .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShashi Kant Pandey Vs. Executive Engineer, Anusandhan Avam Niyojan, Ja ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-23-2003
Reported in: (2003)2UPLBEC1738
..... in a case in which in accordance with the provisions of section 35 3 of the bihar university act 1951 services were terminated on ..... be terminated at any time without notice 16 exercising the power under section 35 3 of the act order was passed which was challenged before ..... the persons could be terminated without further notice that is how section 35 3 in this case will have to be read the other .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAtladara Kelavani Mandal and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Oct-09-2003
Reported in: (2004)1GLR244
..... be assailed on the ground that it violates the statutory provision of section 35 even otherwise also the provisions of section 35 providing for selection and appointment of staff would be applicable in a ..... are various provisions relating to services in registered private secondary schools and as provided under section 35 selection or appointment of the staff is to be regulated in the manner as .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial