Section 333 - Judgment Search Results

Balraj Suri Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: ILR1983Delhi790

..... the letter if 6 1 1979 itself characterised the said letter as a notice under section 333 we cannot agree various objections were raised by the corporation seeking further information as to ..... application does not purport to be under section 333 but in fact none of the requirements of section 333 read with bye laws is even complied with section 333 demands an application to be as prescribed .....

Rm (Ap) Vs. the Scottish Ministers

Court: UK Supreme Court

..... counsel for the appellant submitted that it could be inferred from section 333 2 that the intention of the scottish parliament was that ..... why counsel asked rhetorically would the parliament have bothered to enact section 333 2 if that was its intention why not leave matters ..... one to infer from a commencement provision in the form of section 333 2 that parliament did not intend that the provisions to .....

Subhas Chandra Pratihar Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 2008CriLJ1320

..... impugned order holding that there was no material to frame charge under section 333 i p c being aggrieved by the said order the instant ..... into the merits of the matter and observed that the offence under section 333 i p c exclusively triable by the court of sessions was not ..... by the impugned order held that there was no material to attract section 333 i p c and that none of the offences was triable .....

Karnel Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: RLW2003(1)Raj305; 2002(3)WLC169; 2002(2)WLN660

..... appellant but the prosecution has proved its case for offence under sections 333 and 33 i p c against the accused beyond reasonable doubt ..... and the accused appellant is entitled to acquittal for offence under sections 333 and 332 i p c for the reasons mentioned above the ..... which he convicted and sentenced the accused appellant for offence under section 333 and 332 i p c are set aside and the accused .....

Rakesh Rai Vs. the State of Sikkim

Court: Sikkim

..... weight 11 undoubtedly the appellant accused has been awarded the maximum sentence as prescribed under section 333 of the ipc the trial court while awarding the sentence to the appellant gave due ..... years and in combination with the offence deterring the public servant the punishment prescribed under section 333 of the ipc is 10 years the trial court exercised its judicial discretion to award .....

indira Rani Devi Vs. Nagar Palika and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR2000All346

..... then during the period of supersession itself the area was constituted into a municipality section 333 of the u p municipalities act makes provision for the interregnum between the creation ..... district magistrate could not delegate his powers to another officer ignores the specific provisions of section 333 of the u p municipalities act which specifically confers powers on the district magistrate .....

Subba and anr. Vs. Deputy Director of Consolidation and anr.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 2008(3)AWC2793

..... not restrict the jurisdiction of the revisional court as conferred by section 333 of u p zamindari abolition and land reforms act 1950 ..... order in our opinion this full bench decision equally applies to section 333 the finality mentioned by sub rule 3 of rule 115n ..... was subject to revisional jurisdiction of the board of revenue under section 333 of the u p zamindari abolition and land reforms act .....

State Vs. Ram Lakhan and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1954All680

..... the offences under section 323 read with section 149 and section 333 read with section 149 or to be more accurate of the offences under section 149 read with section 323 and section 149 read with section 333 should have ..... accused individually against whom a verdict of guilty was given by the jury under sections 323 149 sections 333 149 i p c it was proved that they had themselves inflicted injuries .....

State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Saleem @ Chamaru and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2005SC3996; 2005CriLJ3435; JT2005(6)SC293; (2005)5SCC554

..... found accused salim chamaru guilty of having committed offence punishable under section 307 read with section 34 ipc and section 333 read with section 34 ipc he was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for five ..... as indicated in the first part i e 10 years the maximum punishment provided for section 333 is imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to 10 years with .....

Sanuman and ors. Vs. Emperor

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1921All19; 63Ind.Cas.401

..... charges which were framed against all these persons were under sections 333 and 332 indian penal code then followed a charge under section 225 against all the accused with the exception of jagarnath ..... that with one exception every person has been convicted under section 333 and that the heaviest sentences have been passed under that section all the other sentences run concurrently except in the case .....