Section 32 - Year 2013 - Judgments

Mar 08 2013 (HC)

Ved Parkash Kharbanda Vs. Vimal Bindal

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-08-2013

..... of all the matters before the court as defined in section 3 of the indian evidence act including the statement of the witnesses the ..... order to discover the truth the supreme court observed as under 32 in this unfortunate litigation the court s serious endeavour has to ..... parties as truth is the basis of the justice delivery system 32 with the passage of time it has been realised that people .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 29 2013 (SC)

Noor Mohammed Vs. Jethanand and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jan-29-2013

..... whether it involves any substantial question of law within the meaning of section 100 it has undoubtedly caused serious concern to my conscience that ..... matter stood adjourned to 10 11 2010 thereafter an application under section 100 5 read with order 41 rule 2 code of civil ..... for faith is the lsquo elan vital rsquo of our system 32 coming to the proceedings before the high court from the date .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 29 2013 (SC)

Noor Mohammed Vs. Jetha Nand and anr

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jan-29-2013

..... whether it involves any substantial question of law within the meaning of section 100 it has undoubtedly caused serious concern to my conscience that ..... matter stood adjourned to 10 11 2010 thereafter an application under section 100 5 read with order 41 rule 2 code of civil ..... with solemnity for faith is the elan vital of our system 32 coming to the proceedings before the high court from the date .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 12 2013 (TRI)

M/S Pachranga International (Chander Group) Vs. M/S Pachranga Internat ...

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Decided on: Jul-12-2013

..... bhujia wala and another 1999 ptc 19 466 trade and merchandise marcs act 1958 section 32 registration of trade mark fraud committed in obtaining the registration fraud vitiate all transactions ..... and under the law the respondents have no effective defence 8 in the result ora 32 2006 tm del is allowed and registered trade mark 1346594 in class 29 is removed .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 07 2013 (HC)

Vishal Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Mar-07-2013

..... the same in racks for selling to customers as per the provision of section 32 i of pfa rules in case of wholesale packages the particulars under ..... 2 whereby applicants have been convicted u s 7 2 read with section 16 1 a 1 of the prevention of food adulteration act 1954 ..... aside applicants are acquitted to the offence u s 7 2 read with section 16 1 a 1 of the prevention of food adulteration act 1954 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 07 2013 (HC)

Ramesh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Mar-07-2013

..... the same in racks for selling to customers as per the provision of section 32 i of pfa rules in case of wholesale packages the particulars under ..... 2 whereby applicants have been convicted u s 7 2 read with section 16 1 a 1 of the prevention of food adulteration act 1954 ..... aside applicants are acquitted to the offence u s 7 2 read with section 16 1 a 1 of the prevention of food adulteration act 1954 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 21 2013 (SC)

Yakub Abdul Razak Memon. Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Cbi , B ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Mar-21-2013

..... 49 it is however the contention of the learned senior counsel shri gopal subramanium that section 32 1 can be so construed as to include the admissibility of confessions of the co ..... the answer in our view should be in the negative on a plain reading of section 32 1 the confession made by an accused before a police officer shall be admissible against .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 10 2013 (HC)

Adv.S.Ajayakumar Vs. the Joint Registrr of Co-operative Societies

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Oct-10-2013

..... operative societies hence they are justified in issuing notice under section 32 1 of the act it is further contended that the ..... the same would not amount to effective consultation as provided under section 32 2 of the act the learned counsel placed reliance upon ..... in accordance with the rules and the procedure of supersession under section 32 1 should be avoided the district co operative bank which .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 26 2013 (HC)

Present: Mr. Aalok Jagga Advocate Vs. State of Punjab and Others …re ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Feb-26-2013

..... air 196 punjab 226 has laid down a similar proposition on the conjoint reading of section 32 and section 33 of the act and after referring to all the judgments noted hereinbefore same ..... with persons who are eligible to present documents for registration before the proper registration office section 32 specifies three categories of persons who can present documents for registration the use of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 11 2013 (HC)

Delhi University Teachers Association and Another Vs. University of De ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-11-2013

..... and ordinances what needs to be examined is whether sub section 4 of section 32 is a condition precedent for the validity and legal effect ..... by virtue of the delegated legislation provisions amendment act 2004 section 32 4 of the said act stipulated that every statute ordinance or ..... gazette the first provision that we have to examine is section 32 4 of the said act which stipulates that every statute .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Section 32 - Judgment Search Results