Section 301 - Judgments

Mar 20 1990 (FN)

Chauffeurs Local 391 Vs. Terry

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-20-1990

..... of the court of appeals it is so ordered footnote 1 section 301 a of the labor management relations act 1947 provides for ..... respondents action cannot be characterized as wholly equitable since the 301 issue which respondents must prove in order to prevail is ..... the collective bargaining agreement an employee normally cannot bring a 301 action against an employer unless he can show that the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 26 1987 (FN)

ibew Vs. Hechler

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-26-1987

..... that court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion it is so ordered footnote 1 section 301 of the labor management relations act 1947 lmra states suits for violation of contracts ..... however in extending the preemptive effect of 301 beyond suits for breach of contract it would be inconsistent with congressional intent under that section to preempt state rules that proscribe conduct .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 10 1962 (FN)

Smith Vs. Evening News Association

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Dec-10-1962

..... be given a narrow reading id at 348 u s 456 348 u s 457 section 301 has been applied to suits to compel arbitration of such individual grievances as rates of ..... language and structure of 301 nor its legislative history requires or persuasively supports this restrictive interpretation which would frustrate rather than serve the congressional policy expressed in that section the possibility that .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 18 1962 (FN)

Atkinson Vs. Sinclair Refining Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-18-1962

..... and that the union members were not to be subject to levy section 301 b has three clauses one makes unions suable in the courts of ..... violation of a company rule any grievance to be filed under this section must be filed within forty 40 days from the effective date of ..... s 253 9 the decision of the board aforesaid as provided in section 8 hereof shall be final however if the rules and conditions existing .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 26 1981 (FN)

Clayton Vs. Automobile Workers

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-26-1981

..... internal procedures with the relief available against the union under 301 footnote 9 section 301 a of the labor management relations act 1947 61 stat ..... that act entitled bill of rights of members of labor organizations section 101 a 4 provides no labor organization shall limit the right ..... the appropriate agency 391 u s at 391 u s 426 section 101 a 4 reflects what i believe to be the reasonable .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 16 1985 (FN)

Allis-chalmers Corp. Vs. Lueck

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-16-1985

..... particular wisconsin tort as applied would frustrate the federal labor contract scheme established in 301 iii a section 301 of the lmra states suits for violation of contracts between an employer and a ..... in the alternative if his claim were deemed to arise under state law instead of section 301 it was preempted by federal labor law app to pet for cert 26 27 the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 16 1991 (FN)

Wooddell Vs. Electrical Workers

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Oct-16-1991

..... brief for the association for union democracy et al as amici curiae urging reversal 1 section 301 a states suits for violation of contracts between an employer and a labor organization representing ..... a contract between two unions 3 and because 301 is not 3 the 301 issue is stated as follows by both petitioner and respondents does section 301 of the labor management relations act create .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 09 1987 (FN)

Caterpillar, Inc. Vs. Williams

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-09-1987

..... s 391 394 b respondents state law contract claims are not completely preempted 301 claims section 301 governs claims founded directly on rights created by collective bargaining agreements and claims ..... allege that caterpillar has entered into and breached individual employment contracts with them section 301 says nothing about the content or validity of individual employment contracts it is .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 06 1988 (FN)

Lingle Vs. Norge Div., Magic Chef, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-06-1988

..... granted certiorari to resolve the conflict in the circuits 484 u s 895 1987 ii section 301 a of the labor management relations act of 1947 61 stat 156 29 u s ..... 220 respondents allege that caterpillar has entered into and breached individual employment contracts with them section 301 says nothing about the content or validity of individual employment contracts it is true that .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 05 1962 (FN)

Teamsters Vs. Lucas Flour Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-05-1962

..... u s 98 distinguished pp 369 u s 98 101 2 section 301 a of the labor management relations act 197 did not ..... bring about industrial peace was through voluntary not compelled labor agreements section 301 is torn from its roots when it is held to require ..... courts which have assumed jurisdiction over suits involving contracts subject to 301 few have explicitly considered the problem of state versus federal .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Section 301 - Judgment Search Results