Skip to content

Did you mean: section 2006?


Section 3006a - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: section 3006a Page 1 of about 31 results (0.008 seconds)
Mar 05 2012 (FN)

Martel Vs. Clair

Court: US Supreme Court

..... not draw the same lines as the constitution and neither 3006a nor 3599 does so in addressing the substitution of counsel section 3006a applies the interests of justice standard to substitution motions even ..... as 3599 to govern appointment of counsel in capital cases thus displacing 3006a for persons facing execution but retaining that section for all others see anti drug abuse act 102stat 4393 4394 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 30 1999 (FN)

MartIn Vs. Hadix

Court: US Supreme Court

..... greater 366 opinion of ginsburg j than 150 percent of the hourly rate established under section 3006a of title 18 for payment of court appointed counsel 42 u s c 1997e d ..... contrast 802addressing appropriate remedies in prison litigationexplicitly provides that it applies to pending cases this section shall apply with respect to all prospective relief whether such relief was originally granted or .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 23 1973 (FN)

Bennett Vs. Hogan

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of appeals and remand the case to that court so ordered mr justice rehnquist dissents section 3006a c reads in part as follows a person for whom counsel is appointed shall be ..... was ignored his right to have appointed counsel here is clear 18 u s c 3006a c cf douglas v california 372 u s 353 1963 subsequently the petitioner requested another .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

1991

Demarest Vs. Manspeaker

Court: US Supreme Court

..... affidavit of such witnesses attendance given by counsel appointed pursuant to section 3006a of title 18 in a criminal case in which a ..... not intend to permit prisoners to receive witness fees held section 1821 requires payment of witness fees to a convicted state ..... fees within 1821 although the government s reading of these two sections is literally plausible it is inconsistent with the government s .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 09 1971 (FN)

Doherty Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... ambiguous phrase through appeal has been clarified by a 1970 amendment to another section 18 u s c 3006a d 6 now provides if a person for whom counsel is appointed under ..... material witness or seeking relief under section 2241 2254 or 2255 of title 28 or section 4245 of title 18 footnote 6 18 u s c 3006a g another important difference between the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

1991

In Re Berger

Court: US Supreme Court

..... appointed counsel s general office overhead and to ensure adequate compensation for representation provided that section also recommends that courts limit the hourly rate for attorney compensation in federal capital prosecutions ..... represent capital defendants under the cja in an amount exceeding the 2 500 limit of 3006a d 2 of that act guidelines developed by the judicial conference to assist courts .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 04 1979 (FN)

Ferri Vs. Ackerman

Court: US Supreme Court

..... argued that the sufficiency of the malpractice complaint was supported by various sections of the pennsylvania rules of civil procedure and the pennsylvania constitution ..... s c 5821 5822 5861 5871 footnote 2 18 u s c 3006a the record indicates that petitioner had previously been represented by two ..... case or 400 where only misdemeanors are charged 18 u s c 3006a d 1 2 footnote 15 see h r rep no 864 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 10 1976 (FN)

United States Vs. Maccollom

Court: US Supreme Court

..... appropriated for those purposes fees for transcripts furnished in proceedings brought under section 2255 of this title to persons permitted to sue or appeal in ..... to persons proceeding under the criminal justice act 18 u s c 3006a or in habeas corpus proceedings to persons allowed to sue defend or appeal ..... 3 1 28 u s c 753 f 18 u s c 3006a a c d 6 footnote 3 2 the provision for free transcripts .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 29 1994 (FN)

Mcfarland Vs. Scott

Court: US Supreme Court

..... a habeas corpus proceeding when possible claims and their factual bases are researched and identified section 848 q 9 clearly anticipates that capital defense counsel will have been appointed under 848 ..... has been designated a community defender organization in accordance with 18 u s c 3006a for the purpose of providing representation assistance information and other related services to eligible .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 12 1972 (FN)

James Vs. Strange

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the time of payment to carry out the provisions of this section except as so authorized or directed no such person or organization ..... shall be brought against any person under the provisions of this section to recover for sums expended on behalf of an indigent defendant ..... there is also a federal reimbursement provision 18 u s c 3006a f receipt of other payments whenever the united states magistrate or .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //