Section 3 Of The Commissions Of Inquiry Act - Judgment Search Results

Sohanlal Pahladrai Vaid Vs. State

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1965Bom1; (1964)66BOMLR353; 1965CriLJ10; ILR1964Bom679

..... 7 l j n s 268 referred to 3 both the learned trial magistrate as well as the learned sessions judge held that in view of section 6 of the commission of inquiry act 1952 the statements of prosecution witnesses before the commission could not be used to contradict them .....

A. L. Mechling Barge Lines, Inc. Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

..... the commission says that it does not grant relief under 4 when the rates proposed result in violations of other sections of the act ..... than for ex barge corn mechling urges that the commission should have allowed full inquiry into this contention and should have determined whether 3 4 is being violated in defense of its position .....

The Guntur Tobacco Market Committee Vs. Yarabothu Narasaiah

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1965AP266; (1967)ILLJ1AP

sue for damages in the face of section 42 and section 21 b of the specific relief act it is not inconsistent with section 9 bye law 20 clauses 92 and 30 which was then therefore and which makes the chairman as most objectionable that he was guilty of several omissions and commissions which the committee found against him that no suit under that no suit under section 42 of the specific relief act lies and that the plaintiff cannot impose himself on the

Amichand Valanji and ors. Vs. G.B. Kotak and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1966Bom70; (1965)67BOMLR234

..... no conflict between sub sections 1 and 2 of section 3 of the defence of india act the clauses listed in section 3 2 are mere elaboration ..... for the cash or the for deferred payments or for commission remuneration or others valuable consideration there is inclusive clauses including ..... powers and the means not inappropriate to achieve it the inquiry stops whether less than was done might have been enough .....

N. Ramachandra Iyer Vs. Thomas Mathai

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1966Ker65

1961 bom 23 is misplaced it is quite clear from section 51 that arrest by itselfl is not execution any more he was not he could still be arrested in execution 3 i dismiss the appeal b of the proviso to section was that arrest in those circumstances was permissible pending an inquiry under rule 40 as to whether or not the judgment the substitution of shall for may by section 3 of act xxi of 1936 that is obligatory not discretionary though the

Shyamsingh Vs. Deputy Inspector General of Police, Central Reserve Pol ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1965Raj140

of the act it is pointed out by him that section 11 deals only with minor punishments detailed in clauses a s conviction and acquitted mm of the charge the commandant 3rd battalion then commenced departmental proceedings against the petitioner and framed learned judges in the said case that there was no inquiry worth the name by the domestic tribunal we have already dismissal if he is not convicted and sentenced under the act 7 the perusal of section 11 shows that it deals

Dr. Jnanendra Nath Das Vs. State of Orissa

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1964Ori241; (1965)ILLJ173Ori

..... the application of clauses i to iii of section 3 1 a and in that sense foreign to the act the satisfaction of the detaining authority ..... adverse inference from the omission as much as from the commission ext 20 was also used as a piece of evidence under ..... of witnesses can be treated as substantive evidence in the inquiry before the tribunal provided they were duly tendered proved and exhibited .....

State of Maharashtra Vs. Hans George

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1965SC722; [1965]35CompCas557(SC); [1965]1SCR123

..... provision corresponding for example to that contained in section 3 2 of the english statutory instruments act of 1946 for the publication in any form ..... on the presumption that mens rea is essential for the commission of any statutory offence unless the language of the statute expressly ..... that it would be practicable for him to make continuous inquiry to see whether an order had been made against him .....

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Mayer Hans George

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1965)67BOMLR583

..... provision corresponding for example to that contained in section 3 2 of the english statutory instruments act of 1946 for the publication in any form ..... on the presumption that mens rea is essential for the commission of any statutory offence unless the language of the statute ..... that it would be practicable for him to make continuous inquiry to see whether an order had been made against him .....

Shyamlal Mohanlal Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 1965CriLJ256; [1965]2SCR457

..... police officer calling upon a person charged with the commission of an offence to produce a document or thing in his possession ..... personally to produce the same 3 nothing in this section shall be deemed to affect the indian evidence act 1872 sections 123 and 124 or to ..... necessary or desirable for the purposes of any investiga tion inquiry trial or other proceeding under this code by or before .....