Section 3 Of The Commissions Of Inquiry Act - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: section 3 of the commissions of inquiry act Court: rajasthan Year: 1984 Page 1 of about 300 results (2.243 seconds)Mahavir Singh Vs. Union of Indai (Uoi) and ors.
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Aug-07-1984
Reported in : 1984WLN(UC)291
..... superiors he was however allowed the benefit of section 3 of i the probation of offenders act and was ordered to be released after ..... appellant was about sixteen years of age on the date of commission of the alleged offence and had not completed eighteen years ..... any major penalty on the delinquent employee without any further departmental inquiry if the authority is of the opinion that the employee .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSohan Singh and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Jan-31-1984
Reported in : 1984WLN6
..... of a complaint regarding the commission of a cognizable offence the power under section 156 3 can be invoked by the ..... proceedings should not be proceeded against under section 29 of the police act the case of the petitioners is that ..... section 156 3 and the power to direct investigation conferred by section 202 1 are entirely different in the present case the magistrate had not embarked upon any inquiry .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRadhey Shyam Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Aug-31-1984
Reported in : AIR1985Raj65; 1985(2)WLN210
of suspension which is similar to one passed under sub section 1 a of section 102 of the punjab gram panchayat such preliminary inquiry and to make a report to him 3 any preliminary inquiry against the chairman or a member of that stage at least it must be taken that the inquiry as contemplated under section 17 4 a hail started in procedural fairness embodying natural justice is to be implied whenever action is taken affecting the rights of parties it may be
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNandlal Sharma S/O Pandit Ramdeo Vs. Chief Secretary, State of Rajasth ...
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Mar-12-1984
Reported in : 1984WLN161
supreme court can suo moto initiate the proceedings even under section 15 of the contempt of courts act a high court person with the consent in writing of such law officer 3 shri nandlal sharma the petitioner present in person confronted with facie satisfied that the information received by it regarding the commission of contempt of a subordinate court is not frivolous and the source of information on which the high court can act on its own motion if the high court acts on
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPrakash Chandra Ajmera Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Feb-21-1984
Reported in : 1984WLN758
prosecution as has been indicated earlier within the meaning of section 17 of the act that the offence has been committed 1 if the person contravening an order made under section 3 is a company every person who at the time of to the affairs of the firm and thereby allows the commission of the offence then he should be deemed to have every partner is responsible under the partnership act for the acts done by any of the partner in the miner of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Rajasthan Through Executive Engineer Pwd (Bandr) and anr. Vs. ...
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Oct-22-1984
Reported in : 1985(1)WLN449
1986 act was in force and under clause h of section 2 a juvenile was described to mean a child who cost of rs 1 000 workmen compensation act 1923 section 30 compensation compensation awarded to beldar who fell down from tractor but put impediment in its determination before the workmen compensation commissioner by putting all legal and technical defences re enacting merchant not completed eighteen years of age when the juvenile justice act 2000 came into force juvenile act of 2000 has been
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAnada Ram and Shanker Vs. the State of Rajasthan
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Jul-02-1984
Reported in : 1984WLN(UC)361
the accused appellants in prat set aside the conviction under section 302 ipc the accuse appellants are behind the bars for come to the conclusion that he has been murdered pw 30 parmanand has states that in the month of february 1978 recoveries are not sufficient to connect the accused with the commission of the crime of murder learned counsel for the annelid wath of virendrasingh in the truck the information report under action 27 was recorded and has been marked by the investigating
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMan Industrial Corporation Ltd. Vs. the Judge Industrial Tribunal and ...
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Apr-09-1984
Reported in : 1985(1)WLN109
pointed out that object of clauses a and b of section 23 of the act is to ensure an atmosphere of 16 1969 to october 8 1969 payable in three instalments 3 in this writ petition it has been urged by the was about sixteen years of age on the date of commission of the alleged offence and had not completed eighteen years provisions of sub section b of section 23 of the act were applicable and the workmen employed in the establishment were
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAutomobiles Co-operative Workshop Ltd. Vs. Sukh Singh
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Sep-10-1984
Reported in : 1984WLN(UC)293
determined and decided by the civil court and so under section 75 of the act the matter can be heard and on the date of alleged occurrence appellant was arrested on 30 11 1998 when the 1986 act was in force and was about sixteen years of age on the date of commission of the alleged offence and had not completed eighteen years business of the society when by repeal of the old act in section 75 of the present act specifically such an
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJethmal Vs. Khusalsingh
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Jul-09-1984
Reported in : 1984WLN232
the legislature was anxious to see that this power under section 41 2 granted to a police official is not misused bail and anticipatory bail was granted to him on december 3 1977 the accused became highly annoyed when he failed in the questions involved in the instant case looking to the commissions and omissions of the accused 16 assuming now that the cannot be held by any strech of imagination that the act of the accused refusing to release the complainant on bail
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT