Skip to content


Section 3 Of The Commissions Of Inquiry Act - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: section 3 of the commissions of inquiry act Court: rajasthan Year: 1969 Page 1 of about 169 results (1.497 seconds)
Feb 27 1969 (HC)

Dhiria and ors. Vs. JainaraIn and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Feb-27-1969

Reported in : AIR1970Raj102; 1970CriLJ729; 1969()WLN99

instance and therefore section 205 cr p c was inapplicable section 540a cr p c was also inapplicable submitted learned counsel before the magistrate the petitioners have come up before me 3 mr jain appearing for the applicants submits that these 29 a pleader dispense with his attendance and proceed with his inquiry or trial in his absence from the amendment of section

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 31 1969 (HC)

Abdul Aziz Vs. Manmath Kumar

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-31-1969

Reported in : 1969WLN52

the disqualification mentioned in latter part of clause xiii of section 26 is a disqualification for being chosen as a member board during the term for which he has been elected 3 the tribunal on the interpolation of clause xiii to section board before his election to the board and a similar act after his election alike because in the former case the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 18 1969 (HC)

Municipal Council, Jaipur and anr. Vs. Sewan Das

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Dec-18-1969

Reported in : AIR1971Raj5; 1971CriLJ85

employees are not excluded from the definition of workman in section 2 s merely on the ground that they are part to pay a fine of rs 200 only 2 on 3 10 1963 the food inspector called upon the respondent who sometimes looking to the nature of the establishment and its activities the employer may need the services of a person only

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 10 1969 (HC)

Manglaram Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Feb-10-1969

Reported in : AIR1970Raj32; 1970CriLJ300; 1969()WLN71

an officer of the r a c as defined in section 2 3 of the act as he did not sign say in his interpretation of statutes eleventh edition at page 364 where powers rights or immunities are granted with a direction a c as defined in section 2 3 of the act as he did not sign any statement as required by

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 14 1969 (HC)

State of Rajasthan and anr. Vs. the Bundi Electric Supply Co. Ltd., Bu ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Aug-14-1969

Reported in : AIR1971Raj24

be due for the detention of the debt illustration n section 73 is an instance where there can be no compensation on account of interest from 12 12 47 to 31 3 48 against the above claim and the balance of rs with the learned counsel that article 110 of the said act is not applicable to the facts and circumstances of this

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 31 1969 (HC)

Vishwa Nath Singh and ors. Vs. Gopilal

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Oct-31-1969

Reported in : 1970WLN466

shall be considered to have been validly deposited under that section unless the deposit is made within fifteen days of the deposit of rs 18 on 25 8 1969 of rs 30 on 25 11 1966 of rs 36 on 20 1 of the u p temporary control of rent and eviction act no 3 of 1947 section 7 c 1 and 2

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 02 1969 (HC)

Mahalakshmi Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-02-1969

Reported in : [1970]75ITR517(Raj)

court on 1st july 1957 this court however acting under section 398 of the indian companies act appointed shri o n appointed which managed the company from 17th november 1958 to 30th may 1959 on 30th may 1959 a new board of that the company was liable to pay the managing agents commission for the period up to 12th september 1956 but the court however acting under section 398 of the indian companies act appointed shri o n sharma labour commissioner of the state

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 13 1969 (HC)

Praduman Kumar Vs. Girdhari Singh and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-13-1969

Reported in : AIR1970Raj131; 1969()WLN139

order against which the present revision application has been preferred 3 it is contended on behalf of the petitioner that once

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 22 1969 (HC)

Shikhar Chand Sethi Vs. the Divisional Mechanical Engineer (E), Wester ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Aug-22-1969

Reported in : AIR1970Raj210

air 1937 pc 31 in connection with the scope of section 96b of the government of india act 1935 a provision be exercised according to law or rules framed under article 309 or analogous law if there is no rule or law the same charge according to mr sharma if a fresh inquiry was ordered by the disciplinary authority under rule 1706 4 suspension mr sharma could not point out anv reason which actuated the d m e to behave in such a manner

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 02 1969 (HC)

Rana Hemant Singhji, Dholpur Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Rajasthan ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Dec-02-1969

Reported in : AIR1970Raj270

of section 2 4a chargeable to capital gains tax under section 12 b of the income tax act 1922 3 the under section 12 b of the income tax act 1922 3 the main point which has been urged before this court may be made to the judgment of the appellate assistant commissioner of income tax the appellate assistant commissioner has given the within clause ii of section 2 4 a of the act 4 we are of the view that the tribunal has

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //