Section 296 - Judgment Search Results

Sri K. Venkataramaiah, Vs. Sri Katterao S/O Shamrao Deshapande

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 2008CriLJ1547

..... to record the substance of the sworn statement he also submitted that the evidence under section 296 of cr p c cannot be used as sworn statement before magistrate the sworn statement ..... statement on par with the evidence as stated in section 296 cr p c he also submitted that the scope and purpose of section 296 of cr p c is entirely different from the .....

Sri K. Venkataramaiah and ors. Vs. Sri Katterao

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR2008KAR474; 2008(4)KarLJ587; 2008(1)KCCR354; 2008(2)AIRKarR284; 2008CriLJ1547; 2008(2)AICLR844

..... the substance of the sworn statement he also submitted that the evidence under section 296 of criminal procedure code cannot be used as sworn statement before magistrate the sworn statement does ..... on par with the evidence as stated in section 296 criminal procedure code he also submitted that the scope and purpose of section 296 of criminal procedure code is entirely different from the provisions .....

Shelatkar Construction Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Creative Enterprises and ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: IV(2008)BC32

..... learned counsel for the accused referred to section 296 of the code of criminal procedure and sections 16 61 of the indian evidence act ..... in the form of affidavit is subject to cross examination under section 145 of the negotiable instruments act and all omissions and ..... the learned metropolitan magistrate also held that when the provisions of section 145 of the act permitted to lead evidence by way .....

Khim Ram Vs. State

Court: Uttaranchal

Reported in: 2008CriLJ2579

..... of the code of criminal procedure it is specifically provided under section 296 cr p c that the evidence of any person whose ..... here that before the sessions judge while recording the statement under section 313 of the code of criminal procedure a purported statement ..... and a criminal proceeding unless specifically provided for in terms of section 35 of the evidence act the register maintained in the .....

Sri Rama Mahal, Srikalahasthi and ors. Vs. R. Rajasekhar

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2007(6)ALD267; IV(2008)BC19

the defendants contend that a sum of rs 1 11 296 which was due to various film distributors of tirupati by

Rita Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... sentencing factors and given the record its ultimate sentence was reasonable section 3353 c calls for the judge to state his reasons but ..... that our previous decision in blakely v washington 542 u s 296 2004 applied to sentences imposed under the federal sentencing guidelines because ..... animus filled that role see blakely v washington 542 u s 296 305 2004 footnote 2 for similar reasons i recognize that .....

Cunningham Vs. California

Court: US Supreme Court

..... taken into consideration by the sentencing commission in formulating the guidelines section 3742 e directed the court of appeals to determine inter ..... sentencing reform act reform act blakely v washington 542 u s 296 304 305 and facts triggering a sentence range elevation under ..... s sentencing reform act blakely v washington 542 u s 296 304 305 2004 and facts triggering a sentence range elevation .....

Burton Vs. Stewart

Court: US Supreme Court

..... court lacked jurisdiction to consider the 1998 petition but he is mistaken section 2254 a states that a district court shall entertain a habeas ..... to determine whether our decision in blakely v washington 542 u s 296 2004 announced a new rule and if so whether it applies ..... that burton could not benefit from blakely v washington 542 u s 296 because that decision announced a new rule that did not apply .....

Nandlal Prasad and Etc. Vs. State of Bihar

Court: Patna

..... lal bihari prasad harendra mahto appellants herein and dinesh prasad under sections 364 and 364a of the indian penal code 7 the police ..... behalf of appellant lal bihari prasad appellant in cr appeal no 296 of 2002 20 learned counsels appearing on behalf of the appellants ..... 33 criminal appeal no 274 of 2002 and criminal appeal no 296 of 2002 preferred by harendra mahto and lal bihari prasad respectively .....

Rantosh Dhar Vs. Sashi Prakash and anr.

Court: Guwahati

..... an act of civil contempt within the meaning of clause b of section 2 of the contempt of courts act 1971 if the state ..... passed in civil rule no 296 of 1997 and therefore they are liable to be punished for civil contempt under section 12 of the contempt of ..... the directions contained in the two orders aforementioned 2 civil rule no 296 of 1997 was instituted seeking direction to the state respondents to .....