Section 289 - Judgment Search Results

Sardar Iqbal Singh Kohli Vs. State

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 75(1998)DLT593

..... for the foregoing reasons the petition is allowed under section 276 read with section 289 of the indian succession act and the probate is ..... the case debated on the grant of will as per section 276 amp 289 of the succession act 1925 where there was sufficient proof ..... have filed their affidavits in support of the petition filed under section 276 of the indian succession act the petitioner has also filed .....

Hindustan Photo Films Manufacturing Co. Ltd.. Rep. by Its Managing Dir ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 1998(2)CTC474

from superannuating him till the disposal of o s no 289 of 1997 or till 31 8 1998 when the plaint

Hindustan Photo Films Manufacturing Co. Ltd., Represented by Its Manag ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1998)3MLJ364

court udhagamandalam was not proper after filing o s no 289 of 1997 the respondent himself wanted that suit to be

New Jersey Vs. New York

Court: US Supreme Court

..... but what i find the more serious and difficult ambiguity arises in sections upon which new york state does not 813 rely see ante at ..... statute and used it for nearly 80 years vermont v new hampshire 289 u s 593 613 1933 there was evidence that both states were ..... the precise area of interstate boundary disputes see vermont v new hampshire 289 u s 593 619 1933 t he practical construction of the boundary .....

investigators Association, Dda Vs. Delhi Development Authority

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1998VIIAD(Delhi)527; 76(1998)DLT801; 1998(47)DRJ709

of field investigators as will be borne out from pages 289 to 293 of the paper book i allow the writ

Lewis Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... act of 1994 pub l 103 322 60003 108 stat 1968 section entitled specific offenses for which the death penalty is authorized as ..... the missing offenses united states v sharpnack 355 u s 286 289 1958 aca represents congressional decision of adopting for otherwise undefined offenses ..... to local law united states v sharpnack 355 u s 286 289 1958 the majority quotes these passages with approval ante at 160 .....

Lunding Vs. New York Tax Appeals Tribunal

Court: US Supreme Court

..... and requiring the recipient to report a corresponding increase in income section 631 b 6 disallows nonresidents entire alimony expenses without consideration ..... nonresidents to deduct only their business expenses are per se constitu 289 tional accordingly further inquiry into the state s justification for ..... of personal life expenses see 89 n y 2d 283 289 675 n e 2d 816 820 1996 the court concluded .....

Oubre Vs. Entergy Operations, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... or the individual s representative alleging age discrimination of a kind prohibited under section 4 or 15 may not be considered knowing and voluntary unless at ..... benefits received under it see e g buffum v peter barceloux co 289 u s 227 234 1933 citing state case law from indiana and ..... not to bring such a suit see buffum v peter barceloux co 289 u s 227 234 1933 citing state cases the owbp a simply .....

Gebser Vs. Lago Vista Independent School Dist.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... refusing to imply an otherwise appropriate remedy under a separate section the majority s inappropriate reliance on title ix s administrative enforcement ..... the regulations do not appear to contemplate a condition order 289 ing payment of monetary damages and there is no indication ..... gebser v lago vista independent school dist stevens j dissenting 289 that fact did not affect the court s analysis much less .....

California Vs. Deep Sea Research, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

coeur d alene tribe of idaho 521 u s 261 289 290 1997 o connor j concurring in part and concurring