Section 284 - Judgment Search Results

State of Maharashtra Vs. Ramlal S/O Hanmantlal Malpani and ors. and Om ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1982(2)BomCR13

..... above filed a criminal case against the accused persons under section 272 and section 284 of the indian penal code bearing criminal case no ..... of 1978 is confirmed criminal food poisoning sections 272 and 284 of indian penal code 1860 and sections 2 7 10 10 1 10 ..... food laboratory calcutta for further examination as provided by sub section 5 of section 13 of the prevention of food adulteration act the .....

Mool Chand Vs. Collector, Jalaun and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1982All141

..... the relevant rules rule 285 a says that every sale under sections 284 and 286 of the zamindari abolition and land reforms act shall ..... of the proclamation nor did object to the non compliance with section 35 of the bengal money lenders act further by non observance ..... of the provisions of that section no substantial injury was caused to the judgment debtor it was .....

Tarlok Chand Khanna and Another Vs. Raj Kumar Kapoor and Others

Court: Delhi

Reported in: [1983]54CompCas12(Delhi); ILR1982Delhi156

..... of his death he could nevertheless be removed under s 284 of the act section 284 is based on s 184 of the english act ..... costs counsel fee is assessed at rs 750 companies act 1956 section 284 removal of director applies to all companies and the only exceptions ..... not properly notified 3 a permanent director can be removed under section 284 of the companies act which applies to all companies and the .....

JaIn Swetamber Khattar Bhave Vs. Jugrajmal

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 1981WLN4

..... the grant of probate or letters of administration 2 3 section 284 of the act deals with caveats against grant of probate ..... it necessarily follows that a person who enters caveat under section 284 of the act cannot dispute the title of the testator ..... no force and it is accordingly dismissed summarily succession act 1925 section 284 caveat proceedings for grant of probate probate court cannot decide .....

Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: (1981)22CTR(Kar)91; [1981]6TAXMAN264(Kar)

orderchandrakantaraj urs j 1 petitioner hindustan aeronautics limited is an assessee under the it act 1961 hereinafter referred to as...

Harris Vs. Rivera

Court: US Supreme Court

speculation or inquiry into such matters 284 u s at 284 u s 393 394 footnote 16 see 643 f 2d

Montana Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

tribe of indians v united states 151 ct cl 281 284 f 2d 361 1960 cert denied 366 u s 924

Fair Assessment in Real Estate Assn. Vs. Mcnary

Court: US Supreme Court

..... state tax matters be limited to the actions enumerated in those sections see h r rep no 1503 75th cong 1st sess 1 1937 ..... governments which should at all times actuate the federal courts matthews 284 u s at 284 u s 525 therefore despite the ready access to federal ..... essential elements of federal jurisdiction are present quoting matthews v rodgers 284 u s 521 284 u s 525 526 1932 footnote 2 27 in perez .....

Widmar Vs. Vincent

Court: US Supreme Court

of the establishment clause see post at 454 u s 284 286 but it gives no reason why the establishment clause

San Diego Gas and Elec. Co. Vs. City of San Diego

Court: US Supreme Court

p r co v united states 284 u s 80 284 u s 96 1931 in service of this principle the