Section 28 - Judgment Search Results

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Walker Anjaria and Sons Pvt. Ltd ...

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Reported in: (1996)54TTJ(Ahd.)64

..... the said act are separate and independent of each other sec 28 is a specific provision which empowers the asstt collector of ..... recover duty which has not been levied or has been erroneously refunded sec 130 on the other hand gives a general power to the ..... relating to so called two distinct and independent proceedings under ss 28 and 130 and after giving his deep and thoughtful consideration to .....

German Homeopathic Distributors Vs. Collr. of Cus.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1996)(85)ELT329TriDel

..... 1988 respectively are hit by limitation of time of six months under section 28 of customs act 1962 and hence barred by limitation 2 briefly stated ..... 10 accordingly a less charge demand was issued to the appellants under section 28 of the customs act 1962 in respect of four bills of entry ..... 1962 edition iv copy of notification no 28 10 45 h l dated 21 12 1945 issued under sections 6 2 12 and 33 of the .....

Parenteral Drugs (i) Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1996)(81)ELT533TriDel

..... e l t 171 he also points out that the show cause notice only invokes section 28 l b of the customs act and does not invoke clause d of the above .....

Vilas Shankar Joshi Vs. Maharashtra State Seed Corporation Ltd. and or ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: [1995(71)FLR372]; (1996)IIILLJ546Bom

..... for promotion moved complaint ulp no 152 of 1985 before the industrial court kholapur under section 28 read with items 4 c d e of schedule ii and item 5 of schedule .....

Asha Sangram Rane (Smt.) Vs. Shivaji University and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1998)IIILLJ50Bom

..... court kolhapur dated april 17 1989 made in complaint ulp no 105 of 1988 under section 28 read with items 5 6 9 and 10 of schedule iv of the maharashtra recognition .....

M/S. Seedheshwari Promotors and Builders (P) Ltd. Vs. Asha Thadani

Court: Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

..... the contract it must be declared void being against public policy section 28 of the contract act also leads to the same conclusion i ..... to costs appeal allowed without costs consumer protection act 1986 section 11 and section 15 case referred air 1989 sc 1239 comparative citation 1995 ..... the agreement and introduce such a clause in the receipts dated 28 7 88 and 1 8 85 it is specifically mentioned that .....

Pune District Central Cooperative Bank Ltd. Vs. Hiralal Ramchandra Gai ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1998)IIILLJ7Bom

..... respondent moved complaint ulp no 13 of 1991 before the labour court at pune under section 28 i read with items 1 a b d f and g of scheduled iv of ..... of the view therefore that the industrial court ought to have exercised its powers under section 44 of the act and interfered with the order of the labour court it erred .....

Ram Tirath Sharma Vs. Administrator and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1995(35)DRJ75

..... 3 the rules could be framed by the administrator in exercise of his powers under section 28 of delhi school education act 1973 the rule 108 of delhi school education rules 1973 ..... reasons they contended that the rules had to be approved by the central government under section 28 whenever made by the administrator if they laid down minimum qualifications method of recruitment etc .....

The Nizam Sugars Workers Union, Through Its General Secretary, K. Mysa ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1995(2)ALT91

..... the trade union shall be appointed and removed as also to examine the compliance of section 28 2 read with the bye laws rules of the union all the adverse allegations have .....

Pushpa Vs. Damodar Prasad Goyal

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: II(1996)DMC541

..... 1 this appeal has been preferred by the wife against damodar prasad goyal respondent under section 28 of the hindu marriage act challenging the judgment and decree dated 4 8 93 passed .....