Section 253 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: section 253 Year: 1908 Page 1 of about 740 results (0.059 seconds)In Re: Rudra Gowd and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-30-1908
Reported in: (1908)18MLJ561
..... distinction could be drawn between an order under section 203 cr p c and an order under section 253 or 259 cr p c with this ..... us is whether a magistrate who has discharged an accused person under section 259 cr p c can re entertain a fresh complaint on ..... whether it was competent to a magistrate after dismissing a complaint under section 203 to re hear the complaint when such order of dismissal .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNiaz Ahmad Vs. Abdul Hamid
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Mar-10-1908
Reported in: (1908)ILR30All279
..... the evidence of the plaintiff was partnership property as defined in section 253 of the contract act the plaintiff stated that he was ..... afterwards withdrawn by the plaintiff no permission being given under section 373 of the code of civil procedure to bring a ..... the moradabad suit without permission to bring a fresh suit under section 373 civil procedure code bar the present suit for the portion of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEmperor Vs. Maheswara Kondaya and anr.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-29-1908
Reported in: 4Ind.Cas.1113
..... of authority supports the view that such an order is not a judgment seeing that section 253 criminal procedure code does not require a magistrate to record any reason when discharging an accused unless ..... country it is not open to us by interpretation to extend its application 3 when sections 253 and 437 criminal procedure code are read together it is clear that the legislature never intended that .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChIn Yow Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1908
is within united states v ju toy 198 u s 253 and the petition was dismissed for want of jurisdiction presumably
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKrista Chandra Ghose Vs. Krista Sakha Ghose
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jun-22-1908
Reported in: (1907)ILR36Cal52
roy v durgasoondery dossee 1888 i l r 15 calc 253 the court was asked to control the action of the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn Re Wood and Henderson
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-18-1908
..... of such courts shields v thomas 18 how 253 59 u s 262 this section in effect confers a special jurisdiction in a ..... bankruptcy proceedings there is no provision for the enforcement of this section in another court of bankruptcy where the bankrupt may be ..... reexamine a transaction between the bankrupt and his attorney under this section is administrative in character of which the court of bankruptcy .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAsbell Vs. Kansas
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-23-1908
..... genuine exercise of the police power or really and substantially a regulation of interstate commerce section 27 of chap 495 of the laws of kansas of 1905 prohibiting the transportation of ..... 60 kans 51 affirmed the facts are stated in the opinion page 209 u s 253 mr justice moody delivered the opinion of the court a statute of the state of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Mylapore Hindu Permanent Fund Limited Vs. the Corporation of Madra ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-05-1908
Reported in: (1908)18MLJ349
..... proportionate to the professional incomes of individuals and the profits of companies section 123 of the act which lays down that a person who ..... be taken to mean paid up capital exclusively 2 the law section 176 madras city municipal act 1904 hardly contemplates a reference in ..... jennings v the president municipal commission madras i l r 1887 m 253 are cases under the latter act in the former case it .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBobbs-merrill Co. Vs. Straus
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-01-1908
..... as the court may deem reasonable u s comp stat 1901 p 3416 section 4965 undertakes to work a forfeiture of copyrighted articles and confers a right ..... executing finishing and vending the same u s comp stat 1901 p 3406 sec 4965 if any person after the recording of the title of any map ..... wheaton v peters 8 pet 591 banks v manchester 128 u s 244 253 thompson v hubbard 131 u s 123 131 u s 151 the learned .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMccandless Vs. Pratt
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Dec-21-1908
..... from time to time be expressly provided by law sec 254 the provisions of 253 shall not extend or apply to cases where the ..... in the matter in litigation the writ of error is dismissed sec 252 the commissioner of public lands or superintendent of public works ..... acquired for roads sites of government buildings or other government purposes sec 276 the commissioner may with the consent of the governor sell .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial