Skip to content

Did you mean: section 2?


Section 252 - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: section 252 Sorted by: recent Year: 1968 Page 1 of about 2,643 results (0.07 seconds)
Dec 31 1968 (HC)

Murugappa Kadanthiar Vs. the Inspector of Panchayats-cum-collector of ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-31-1968

Reported in: (1969)1MLJ615

section 51 of the district municipalities act is analogous to section 28 and clause 3 of section 51 is analogous to

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 31 1968 (HC)

G. Natarajan Vs. P. Thandavarayan

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-31-1968

Reported in: (1969)2MLJ19

be characterised as acts of waste within the meaning of section 10 2 iii of act xviii of 1960 the learned

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 30 1968 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Trustees of H.E.H. the Nizam's Miscella ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Dec-30-1968

Reported in: [1969]74ITR558(AP)

that the expression state government used in the proviso to section 8 of the act takes in the government of the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 24 1968 (HC)

Shefali Banerjee Vs. the State and anr.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Dec-24-1968

Reported in: AIR1969Cal544,1969CriLJ1367

provisions of the law also did not contemplate that sub section 3 empowers the magistrate to direct the girl to remove

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 24 1968 (HC)

Kancharla Kesava Rao Vs. Controller of Estate Duty

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Dec-24-1968

Reported in: [1969]74ITR248(AP)

in the indian act is more liberal than the corresponding section under the english act secondly the concept of hindu law

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 23 1968 (HC)

Jatindra Nath Mondal Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Dec-23-1968

Reported in: AIR1969Cal461,[1969(18)FLR87]

d basu j 1 the petitioner was a revenue officer at malda at the material date it is alleged that...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 20 1968 (HC)

Madhya Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, Bhopal Vs. Regional T ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Dec-20-1968

Reported in: AIR1969MP183; 1969MPLJ208

occurs in section 68 b and in terms of that section has effect notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in chapter iv

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 20 1968 (SC)

Peirce Leslie and Co. Ltd. Vs. Miss Violet Ouchterlony Wapshare and or ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Dec-20-1968

Reported in: AIR1969SC843; [1969]39CompCas808(SC); [1969]3SCR203

the dissolution to be void under section 243 apart from section 243 the dissolution might possibly be set aside in a

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 20 1968 (SC)

Ram Autar Jalan Vs. Coal Products P. Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Dec-20-1968

Reported in: [1970]40CompCas715(SC)

kumar ganguli on august 31 1964 the nominated owner under section 76 of the mines act for g l group was

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 20 1968 (HC)

Zalam Singh and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-20-1968

Reported in: AIR1969Delhi285; 5(1969)DLT203

a s gill rent controller delhi was nto valid under section 35 of the delhi rent control act and the authentication

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //