Section 239 - Judgment Search Results

State of Jammu and Kashmir and ors. Vs. Haji Wali Mohammed and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1972SC2538; (1972)2SCC402; [1973]1SCR801

..... time for doing the same shall be specified in the notice section 239 gives the procedure relating to authentication of service of a ..... averment dispensed with the requirement of the statutory provision contained in section 239 of the municipal act in the matter of service of ..... authorities 13 owing to the non compliance with the provisions of section 239 and 238 of the municipal act the action taken by .....

Chhotey Mian Vs. State

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 1973CriLJ908

..... 16 it is true that it is not stated in express terms either in section 236 or section 239 that their provisions would justify the joint trial of offences or of persons mentioned ..... referred to therein were committed at places within the territorial jurisdiction of different courts similarly section 239 provides for the various persons being charged and tried together for the same offence committed .....

Ganesh Neelakant Kulakarni and ors. Vs. State

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 1973CriLJ551

..... if joinder of charges are sought to be justified by the provisions of any other section be it section 235 or section 236 or section 239 cr p c the limit if any imposed by the ..... section sought to be invoked will have to be considered and not the limit prescribed by section 234 .....

Ayodhya Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1972SC2501; 1972CriLJ1696; (1972)3SCC885; [1973]1SCR880; 1973(5)LC346(SC); 1972()WLN609

..... and tried together as such a course is permitted by section 239 of the crpc 10 lastly it has been argued that ..... firm hence it is totally arbitrary since in sub section 2a of section 69 as introduced by the maharashtra legislature clearly violates ..... jj validity suit for dissolution of unregistered firm restrictions under section 69 2a held the maharashtra amendment effects such stringent disabilities .....

Narasingha Patnaik Vs. State of Orissa

Court: Orissa

Reported in: 38(1972)CLT1173; 1973CriLJ1744

..... an end the mere fact that in view of the provisions of section 239 of the code of criminal procedure the special judge thought it ..... warrant provided further that an offence in clause e of sub section 1 of section 5 shall not be investigated without the order of a ..... powers this contention glamorous though is of little assistance for under section 14 3 criminal p c the state government is competent to .....

R.P. Reddy Vs. Chand Mohd. and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 1973CriLJ1082; 1972()WLN637

..... of the word transaction because that also would determine the applicability of section 239 2 of the cr pc which i shall deal with later ..... together as to form in clauses a c sic and d of section 239 would make little difference selling a commodity with counterfeit marks and ..... or not more persons than one can be tried together under section 239 d cr pc the criminal court has to consider the nature .....

Kirby Vs. Illinois

Court: US Supreme Court

388 u s 239 see id at 388 u s 239 n 30 gilbert v california 388 u s at 388

R. Somasundaram and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1973)1MLJ15

part viii of the constitution deals with union territories article 239 inter alia provides that except as otherwise provided by parliament

Board of Regents of State Colleges Vs. Roth

Court: US Supreme Court

..... i would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals footnote 2 1 section 1983 reads as follows every person who under color of any statute ordinance ..... the purpose of the fourteenth amendment to secure truax v raich 239 u s 33 239 u s 1 1915 hughes j see also meyer v nebraska ..... time for any reason or for no reason truax v raich supra at 239 u s 38 in my view every citizen who applies for a government .....

Smith Vs. Florida

Court: US Supreme Court

to dismiss the florida supreme court affirmed two judges dissenting 239 so 2d 250 the page 405 u s 173 case