Section 22f - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: section 22f Year: 1995 Page 1 of about 561 results (0.662 seconds)M.L. Thukral and Another Vs. Krone Communication Ltd. and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-17-1995
Reported in: [1996]86CompCas648(Kar); ILR1995KAR1142; 1995(2)KarLJ107
in cases of mismanagement what is important is that the sections deal with the concept of preventive action essentially in order
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJoint Director of Health Services, Office of Directorate Health Servic ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-31-1995
Reported in: (1996)IILLJ102Bom
the respondent was not a workman within the meaning of section 2 s of the said act 5 it is true
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. U.P. Financial Corporation
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Aug-24-1995
Reported in: (1995)129CTR(All)247; [1996]217ITR191(All); [1995]83TAXMAN565(All)
total income as it stood before the deduction allowable under section 36 1 viii the contention that the deduction has to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKailash Chandra Agarwala Vs. State
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Sep-14-1995
Reported in: 1995(II)OLR470
petitioner is arrayed as an accused in a caste under section 7 1 a of the essential commodities act 1955 in
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAgriculture Produce Market Committee Vs. State of Bihar and anr.
Court: Patna
Decided on: Feb-17-1995
jute yarn was not an agricultural produce as defined under section 2 1 a of the act read with clause vii
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSt. Anthony's High School Trust and Anr. Vs. State of Goa and Anr.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-30-1995
Reported in: 1996(5)BomCR33
been satisfied that an action of taking over management under section 20 of the act can be justified 8 now let
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSaratha's Vs. Assistant Director, Enforcement Directorate
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-02-1995
Reported in: 1997(57)ECC212
the court according to the sanguine provisions adumbrated under sub section 1 of section 59 of fera which prescribes 59 presumption
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPrahladbhai Rajaram Mehta Vs. Popatbhai Haribhai Patel and anr.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Mar-26-1995
Reported in: [1996]87CompCas557(Guj); (1995)2GLR1752
a 14 and 25b of the public premises act and section 1 of the delhi rent control act the question was
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Gujarat Vs. Narges K. Panthaky
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-02-1995
Reported in: AIR1996SC739; (1996)3GLR517; 1995(6)SCALE602; (1996)1SCC298; [1995]Supp4SCR734
it is to defeat the provisions of the act sub section 1 of section 8 of the act reads thus 8
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTransport Manager, Kolhapur Municipal Transport Vs. Ramchandra Joti Ma ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-13-1995
Reported in: (1998)IIILLJ676Bom
first party did not comply with the mandatory provisions of section 25 f of the i d act 1947 7 whether
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial