Section 224 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: section 224 Year: 2003 Page 1 of about 38,145 results (0.141 seconds)R.V. Dnyansagar Vs. Maharashtra Industrial and Technical Consultancy O ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-26-2003
Reported in: 2003(3)ALLMR192; 2003(4)BomCR118; [2005]123CompCas520(Bom); (2003)IIILLJ348Bom; 2003(2)MhLj547; [2003]46SCL153(Bom)
..... the case of a government company the following provisions shall apply notwithstanding anything contained in sections 224 to 233 2 the auditor of a government company shall be appointed or re appointed ..... comptroller and auditor general of india provided that the limits specified in sub sections 1b and 1c of section 224 shall apply in relation to the appointment or re appointment of an auditor .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSurya Dev Rai Vs. Ram Chander Rai and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-07-2003
Reported in: AIR2003SC3044; 2003(5)ALD36(SC); 2003(4)ALLMR(SC)761; 2003(5)ALT19(SC); 2003(4)CTC48; (2004)1GLR320; [2003(4)JCR174(SC)]; 2003(3)KLT490(SC); (2003)3MLJ60(SC); RLW2003(4)SC5
..... and reproduced the predecessor provision however sub section 2 was added in section 224 which confined the jurisdiction of the high court to such judgments of the ..... of other laws conferring revisionsal jurisdiction on the high court section 107 of the government of india act 1915 and then section 224 of the government of india act 1935 were similarly worded .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGokul Chandra Das Vs. Susanta Kumar Das and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-10-2003
Reported in: AIR2003Jhar58; [2003(1)JCR618(Jhr)]
..... executor appointed by the will expressly or according to tenor section 224 of the act provides that when several executors are ..... precludes anexecutor from asking for probate at any time under section 224 succession act where several executors are appointed probate may ..... applying for probate of the will appointing him executor section 231 procedure where executor renounces or fails to accept .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJivanbhai Talsibhai Vasava Vs. State of Gujarat
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jul-22-2003
Reported in: (2004)1GLR460; (2004)1GLR461
..... being c r no 191 of 2000 for the offence punishable under section 224 of the i p c has been lodged at ravpura police station ..... being c r no 191 of 2000 for the offence punishable under section 224 of the i p c has been lodged at ravpura police ..... been examined as independent witness by the complainant while filing challen under section 173 of the indian penal code 29 mr brahambhatt learned advocate .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTinstitute of Chartered Accountants of India Vs. Ajit Kumar Iddya
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-14-2003
Reported in: [2003]128TAXMAN13(Kar)
..... navabharath flange and allied industries ltd bombay without ascertaining compliance of sections 224 and 225 of the companies act 1956 hereinafter referred to as ..... it is held that there is no violation of requirement of sections 224 and 225 of the act and the same has been complied ..... conclusion that any of the measures referred to in sub section 4 of section 13 of the act taken by the secured creditor .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKamath Vs. Institute of Chartered Accountants
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Feb-25-2003
Reported in: [2004]122CompCas825(Ker); (2003)185CTR(Ker)90; 2003(1)KLT769
..... restriction as far as other audit works are concerned except of course the restriction under section 224 of the companies act wherein a chartered accountant is not permitted to audit more than ..... the nature of the work of chartered accountants only a similar restriction was introduced under section 224 of the companies act wherein a chartered accountant is permitted to audit only 20 companies .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTB.K. Kamath Vs. Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Feb-25-2003
Reported in: [2003]130TAXMAN435(Ker)
..... restriction as far as other audit works are concerned except of course the restriction under section 224 of the companies act wherein a chartered accountant is not permitted to audit more than ..... the nature of the work of chartered accountants only a similar restriction was introduced under section 224 of the companies act wherein a chartered accountant is permitted to audit only 20 companies .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJ. Venkateswar Rao and ors. Vs. District Collector and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-27-2003
Reported in: 2004(4)ALD59
..... and reproduced the predecessor provision however sub section 2 was added in section 224 which confined the jurisdiction of the high court to such judgments of the ..... of other laws conferring revisional jurisdiction on the high court section 107 of the government of india act 1915 and then section 224 of the government of india act 1935 were similarly worded .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCentre for Public Interest Litigation Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-16-2003
Reported in: AIR2003SC3277; 2004(5)ALLMR(SC)65; 1(2004)BC173(SC); [2003]117CompCas123(SC); (2003)4CompLJ1(SC); 2003(4)CTC237; JT2003(Suppl1)SC515; 2003(7)SCALE491; (2003)7SCC532; [2003]
..... government company and no other in relation to a government company sections 224 to 233 are substituted and the audit of the company takes ..... of the comptroller auditor general of india who shall give effect to section 224 1 b 1 c the auditors shall submit a report to ..... respectively of the government company 3 the provisions of sub section 2 of section 5 shall apply to a lease or tenancy which vests .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGanpat Lal and ors. Vs. Rajasthan Housing Board and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Nov-13-2003
Reported in: RLW2004(2)Raj1208; 2004(2)WLC146
..... possession on the land in question in second appeal under section 224 of the rajasthan tenancy act 1955 the petitioners claimedthat neither ..... himself aggrieved than to ask for a reference under section 18 section 12 states that the award is final and conclusive ..... can not be challenged subsequently there was no challenge under section 5 a the entire acquisition proceedings were concluded and therefore .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial