Section 206 - Judgment Search Results

Dwarka Das and anr. Vs. Akhay Singh

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: (1908)ILR30All470

..... the wrong court the learned district judge under the provisions of section 206 of the north western provinces rent act act no xii ..... taken to such institution and the learned district judge proceeded under section 206 of the north western provinces rent act which runs as ..... the decision of the civil court apart from the provisions of section 206 of the north western provinces rent act xii of 1881 .....

Sir Jehangir Cawasji Jehangir Vs. the Hope Mills Ltd.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1908)10BOMLR488

..... from that order upon the ground that it was made under either section 206 of the civil procedure code or rule 305 of this court s rules 3 ..... in order to bring the order under section 206 of the code it is necessary that the application was made to ..... treated as one for the mere amendment of the decree under either section 206 of the code or rule 305 6 it must be remembered that .....

Mulla Abdul Hai Vs. Khatija Bgam

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1908)10BOMLR514

..... so when the suit was decided he got something else civil procedure code act xiv of i882 section 206 partition suit preliminary order for partition final decree appeal in appeal both can be questioned .....

Ahmad HusaIn and ors. Vs. Asma Bibi

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: (1908)ILR30All290

..... to the court below for the amendment of the decree dated 8th february 1906 under section 206 of the code as to the full costs the court below after that dismissal under ..... the high court is the only court which has jurisdiction to amend the decree under section 206 of the code of civil procedure 15 i therefore allow the application for revision and .....

Old Dominion Copper Mining Co. Vs. Lewisohn

Court: US Supreme Court

old dominion copper mining co v lewisohn 210 u s 206 1908 u s supreme court old dominion copper mining co

Hudson County Water Co. Vs. Mccarter

Court: US Supreme Court

..... or stream of this state into any other state for use therein by a second section a proceeding like the present was authorized in order enforce the act laws of 1905 ..... owners immediately concerned kansas v colorado 185 u s 125 georgia v tennessee copper co 206 u s 230 the public interest is omnipresent wherever there is a state and grows .....

Virginia Vs. West Virginia

Court: US Supreme Court

court defendant s demurrer having been overruled 206 u s 206 u s 290 206 u s 322 and defendant having

Ex Parte Nebraska

Court: US Supreme Court

was discharged and the petition dismissed and the court said 206 u s 330 the suit was commenced in the state

Home Tel. and Tel. Co. Vs. Los Angeles

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the fourteenth amendment of the constitution of the united states because the section 31 of the charter under whose authority they were enacted does not ..... 368 184 u s 382 vicksburg v vicksburg water works co 206 u s 496 206 u s 508 but for the very reason that such a ..... authority appeared in vicksburg v vicksburg water works co 206 u s 496 the court said p 206 u s 508 the grant of legislative power .....

Richardson Vs. Shaw

Court: US Supreme Court

..... creditor is defined to include anyone who owns a demand or claim provable in bankruptcy sec 1 sub 9 bankruptcy act 1898 3 u s comp st 3419 it is essential ..... of fraud or preferential transfer than the bankrupt himself security warehousing co v hand 206 u s 415 206 u s 423 thompson v fairbanks 196 u s 516 196 u s .....