Section 204 - Judgment Search Results

The Commissioner of Customs Vs. Shri M. Naushad, Appraiser of

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Reported in: (2007)(114)ECC379

..... by both the sides on the question whether the provisions of section 155 would provide a bar to the initiation of adjudication ..... by the respondents which is hot sufficient for imposing penalty under section 114 of the customs act the learned advocate has emphasized ..... knowledge penalty on charge of aiding and abetting would not sustain 204 in the light of the above judicial pronouncement i find .....

Butte, Anaconda and Pacific Ry. Co. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... railway operating income for the three years ended june 30 1917 called the test period section 204 provided for determining similarly the amount of the deficit or losses payable by reference to ..... federal control but which actually was operated by its owners should receive compensation under 204 footnote 16 while 204 granted a bounty it conferred a right and constituted the commission a quasi judicial .....

Califano Vs. Yamasaki

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit syllabus section 204 a 1 of the social security act act authorizes the ..... court to certify a nationwide class and grant injunctive relief i section 204 a 1 of the social security act 53 stat 1368 ..... the overpaid person is entitled section 204 b however expressly limits the recoupment authority conferred by 204 a 1 section 204 b as set forth in .....

K.C.Jose Vs. C.K.Geetha

Court: Kerala

..... 3 klt748 has held that having chosen to exercise the discretion under sec 204 of the cr p c in favour of the accused and having ..... not be persuaded by any court that having exercised the discretion under sec 204 of the cr p c and having led the accused by such ..... accused to custody that issue of summons by exercise of discretion under sec 204 of the cr p c does firmly and eloquently convey that the .....

Sujatha Vs. State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

..... 3 klt748 has held that having chosen to exercise the discretion under sec 204 of the cr p c in favour of the accused and having ..... not be persuaded by any court that having exercised the discretion under sec 204 of the cr p c and having led the accused by such ..... accused to custody that issue of summons by exercise of discretion under sec 204 of the cr p c does firmly and eloquently convey that the .....

Yakus Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... conclusions thus incorporated in the record are not evidence section 204 a requires the transcript of the protest proceedings filed in this ..... judges designated by the chief justice of the united states section 204 a authorizes any person aggrieved by the denial or partial ..... denial of certiorari or decision upon the merits subsection b section 204 d declares the emergency court of appeals and the supreme .....

Levinson Vs. Spector Motor Service

Court: US Supreme Court

..... illinois therefore is affirmed footnote 1 the material parts of 204 are sec 204 a it shall be the duty of the commission 1 ..... it a general clause to the effect that the provisions of section 204 relative to qualifications and maximum hours of service of employees ..... qualifications and maximum hours of service pursuant to the provisions of section 204 of the motor carrier act 1935 hearings on s 1349 .....

Gulf States Utilities Co. Vs. Fpc

Court: US Supreme Court

..... supplement modify or condition any previous order as it may find necessary or appropriate ibid section 204 c grants the commission authority to specify the purpose to which the proceeds of ..... securities to fund construction of a politically controversial transmission line stating the plain purpose of section 204 is to prevent the issuance of securities which might impair the company s financial .....

Calcutta Soft Drinks Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Calcutta Municipal Corporation and ...

Court: Kolkata

..... of other manufacturers the appellants were not entitled to get the benefit of sub section 2 of section 204 of the act 10 being dissatisfied the appellants preferred the present mandamus appeals and ..... before us the appellants having successfully brought their cases within the purview of sub section 2 of section 204 of the act they are entitled to resist the claim of the corporation towards .....

Abdullah Bhat Vs. Ghulam Mohd.

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in: 1972CriLJ277

..... necessary to reproduce the two parts of section 204 namely 204 1 and 204 1 a as follows section 204 1 if in the opinion of a ..... cognizance no prohibition or inhibition as mentioned in section 204 1 a is laid down section 204 i a however provides that before a summons ..... the complainant filing a list of witnesses as required under section 204 1 a the learned sessions judge overruled the objection the .....