Skip to content

Did you mean: section 2?


Section 203 - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: section 203 Year: 1908 Page 1 of about 301 results (0.077 seconds)
Dec 02 1908 (PC)

Rengammal Vs. Krishnamachari and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-02-1908

Reported in: 2Ind.Cas.618a

..... has suffered in any way owing to this omission 3 section 203 of the criminal procedure code also requires the magistrate to record reasons ..... been done this is an irregularity but the statement under section 441 criminal procedure code supplies the omission and having considered that statement ..... criminal procedure code act v of 1898 sections 202 203 441 failure to record reasons for action taken under .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 30 1908 (PC)

In Re: Rudra Gowd and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jul-30-1908

Reported in: (1908)18MLJ561

..... whether it was competent to a magistrate after dismissing a complaint under section 203 to re hear the complaint when such order of dismissal has not ..... distinction could be drawn between an order under section 203 cr p c and an order under section 253 or 259 cr p c with this ..... us is whether a magistrate who has discharged an accused person under section 259 cr p c can re entertain a fresh complaint on .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 28 1908 (PC)

Hassan Kassim Sett Vs. the Asiatic Petroleum Co. Ltd. by their Agents ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Aug-28-1908

Reported in: 4Ind.Cas.1124

..... the judgment of the district court is defective merely by reason of section 203 c p c it is true that no specific issues were framed ..... 3 8 0 a case in the light of the explanation to section 73 of the indian contract act i think 4 annas a case ..... claimed with proportionate costs in both courts contract act ix of 1872 section 73 breach of contract failure to supply goods according to contract measure .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 09 1908 (PC)

Lalbhai Tricamlal Vs. the Municipal Commissioner for the City of Bomba ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-09-1908

Reported in: (1908)10BOMLR821

..... to see whether the defence was made out the commissioner was entitled to act under section 203 on the report of an inspector of buildings and did not act indiscreetly in relying ..... objectionable structures exercise of the power appear interpretation of danger hind of contemplated by the section discretion vested in the commissioner court s interference with the discretion commissioner can act through .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 21 1908 (PC)

Aiyakannu Pillai Vs. Emperor

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-21-1908

Reported in: 1Ind.Cas.597

..... as a magistrate taking cognizance of a complaint under section 195 is entitled to do under section 203 further an investigation under section 202 can only be ordered after the examination of ..... the complainant and cannot therefore be directed by a first class magistrate acting under section 476 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 10 1908 (PC)

Jyotindra Nath Daw Vs. Hem Chandra Daw

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Sep-10-1908

Reported in: (1909)ILR36Cal415,2Ind.Cas.293

..... was fixed for the 9th july on the 9th july the case was dismissed under section 203 of the criminal procedure code by the deputy magistrate on the ground of the absence of the ..... complainant put in a petition before the deputy magistrate who had dismissed the complaint under section 203 of the criminal procedure code praying for a revival of his complaint this deputy magistrate rather hesitated .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 20 1908 (FN)

Southern Pine Lumber Co. Vs. Ward

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-20-1908

by appeal national live stock bank v first national bank 203 u s 296 203 u s 305 and cases cited

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 06 1908 (FN)

Ware and Leland Vs. Mobile County

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-06-1908

120 u s 489 similar cases are rearick v pennsylvania 203 u s 507 and caldwell v north carolina 187 u

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 16 1908 (FN)

Kaizo Vs. Henry

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Nov-16-1908

re wilson 140 u s 575 see in re moran 203 u s 96 203 u s 104 the indictment though

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 20 1908 (FN)

Ex Parte Simon

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-20-1908

had jurisdiction of the cause see united states v shipp 203 u s 563 203 u s 573 but without laying

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //