Section 201 - Judgment Search Results

Robert Skinner Vs. Shanker Lal

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 1Ind.Cas.556

..... declaratory decree the suit now brought is in reality one within the last paragraph of section 201 of the agra tenancy act we allow this appeal set aside the decree on the ..... preliminary point and remand the case under the provisions of section 562 of the code of civil procedure through the lower appellate court to the court .....

Karan Singh Vs. Bechan Singh

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: (1908)ILR30All447

..... the appeal in the court below on the ground that on the true construction of section 201 sub section 3 of the agra tenancy act the plaintiff being recorded as having proprietary title was ..... no ii of 1901 is conclusive this contention ins my judgment is perfectly sound sub section 3 section 201 is as follows if the plaintiff is recorded as having such proprietary right the court .....

Mohendra Nath Ghosh and ors. Vs. Jadu Nath Mullik

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 3Ind.Cas.684

..... and that limitation began to run from the date of the plaintiffs father s death section 201 of the indian contract act expressly says that an agency is terminated by either the ..... act xv of 1877 schedule ii articles 89 and 120 contract act ix of 1872 section 201 principal and agent death of principal termination of agency suit for accounts by principal s .....

Twining Vs. State

Court: US Supreme Court

howard v kentucky 200 u s 164 rawlins v georgia 201 u s 638 felts v murphy 201 u s 123

Louisville and Nashville R. Co. Vs. Mottley

Court: US Supreme Court

194 u s 63 joy v city of st louis 201 u s 332 201 u s 340 devine v los

Kaizo Vs. Henry

Court: US Supreme Court

s 276 riggins v united states supra felts v murphy 201 u s 123 valentina v mercer 201 u s 131

Consolidated Rendering Co. Vs. Vermont

Court: US Supreme Court

..... by its text the company had under its provisions and by the fourth section full opportunity to show cause before the court why it did not ..... order adjudging the party refusing to comply guilty of contempt hale v henkel 201 u s 43 nor is a notice to produce too broad if ..... validity of the order adjudging the company guilty of contempt hale v henkel 201 u s 43 but unless it can be said that the court .....

Richardson Vs. Shaw

Court: US Supreme Court

..... creditor is defined to include anyone who owns a demand or claim provable in bankruptcy sec 1 sub 9 bankruptcy act 1898 3 u s comp st 3419 it is essential ..... s 526 humphrey v tatman 198 u s 91 york mfg co v cassell 201 u s 344 201 u s 352 it is objected to this view of the relation of .....

In Re Metropolitan Railway Receivership

Court: US Supreme Court

..... by the circuit court under 5 of the act of 1875 already cited by that section it must appear to the satisfaction of the circuit court that such suit does not ..... v north carolina 192 u s 286 192 u s 311 blair v chicago 201 u s 400 201 u s 448 smithers v smith 204 u s 632 204 u s .....

Balakrishna Aiyar and ors. Vs. Muthusawmy Aiyar

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 3Ind.Cas.878

judge relied narayan bin babaji v nathaji durgaji 28 b 201 it was held that in a partition suit no co