Section 2009 - Judgment Search Results

Aasti Mahila Prathmik Upbhokta Sahkari Bhandar Maryadit Bhopal Vs. the ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

decided in accordance with the scheme of public distribution system 2009 so also keeping 2 in view the procedure prescribed under

Gordhansingh and ors. Vs. Suwalal and Kalyanbux and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: AIR1959Raj156

..... you we shall not pay any interest upto kartik badi 15 section 2009 we shall pay interest from kartik sudi 1 section 2009 at 7 p c p m and shall repay the money ..... with interest before kartik sudi 1 section 2010 25 the above writing was .....

Mason City and Fort Dodge R. Co. Vs. Boynton

Court: US Supreme Court

..... construct and maintain its railway over and across such premises sec 2009 either party may appeal from such assessment to the district ..... proceedings the landowner shall be plaintiff and the corporation defendant sec 2010 an appeal shall not delay the prosecution of work upon ..... of the assessment is forthwith paid or deposited with him sec 2013 if the amount awarded by the commissioners is decreased on .....

Onkarmal and anr. Vs. Banwarilal and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: AIR1962Raj127

..... the other plaintiff banarsilal these entries are dated jeth sudi 8th section 2009 corresponding to the 2nd june 1952 there is no reason to ..... the other plaintiff banarsilal these entries are dated jeth sudi 8th section 2009 corresponding to the 2nd june 1952 there is no reason to ..... would not amount to coercion in law within the meaning of section 72 of the contract act three contentions were raised by .....

Food Corporation of India Vs. Sukh Deo Prasad

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2009SC2330; 2009(3)AWC2220(SC); 2009(4)SCALE318; (2009)5SCC665:2009AIRSCW3135:2009(3)LHSC1460

..... dismiss the application filed by the respondent under order 39 rule 2a of the code section 100 r v raveendran markanedy katju jj second appeal by tenant government corporation against order ..... corporation of india v sukh deo prasad c a no 380 2007 dd 24 3 2009 order 39 rule 2a r v raveendran markandey katju jj disobedience of injunction powers of .....

Ram Prasad Yadav (Deceased), Bombay Mineral and Allied Industries Empl ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1989(2)SC204; (1989)2SCC382

..... the interest of all the hutment dwellers on the lands of the bombay port trust section 100 r v raveendran markanedy katju jj second appeal by tenant government corporation against order ..... corporation of india v sukh deo prasad c a no 380 2007 dd 24 3 2009 order 39 rule 2a r v raveendran markandey katju jj disobedience of injunction powers of .....

Sub-divisional Officer and Collector, Shivasagar Vs. Shri Gopal Chandr ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1971SC1190; (1972)4SCC263; 1971(III)LC550(SC)

..... and the board of revenue 6 the appeal is dismissed with costs section 3 markandey katju b sudershan reddy jj ecology conservation of wet ..... board of revenue in support of its view had relied upon some sections of the excise act which prescribed penal action in cases of ..... country recommendation made in state of orissa v government of india anr 2009 2 jt sc 233 to constitute a body of eminent scientists .....

Jage Ram and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1995(9)SC126; 1995(6)SCALE431; 1995Supp(4)SCC615; [1995]Supp5SCR49

..... and inadvertent omission to include income for assessment held section 271 1 c imposes a strict liability on assessee ..... rea if essential for imposing penalty held penalty under section 271 1 c is neither criminal nor quasi criminal ..... 2009 8 scale 231 hence case remitted to high court for reconsideration in the light of decisions in dharamendra textile and rajasthan spg nd wvg mills section .....

Haryana State Electricity Board Vs. State of Punjab and Haryana and or ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1972SC2516; 1973LabIC1; (1974)3SCC96

..... wholly occupied by a joint family as provided for in terms of section 23 section 23 has been omitted so as to remove the disability on ..... the same would not prevail over clear and unambiguous provision contained therein section 63 proof of will concurrent finding by courts that will was not ..... in appeal g sekar v geetha ors c a no 2535 2009 dd 15 4 2009 8 the high court was clearly of the view that .....

State Through C.B.i., New Delhi Vs. K.K. Jajodia and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1988(2)SC165; 1990Supp(1)SCC667

..... house wholly occupied by a joint family as provided for in terms of section 23 section 23 has been omitted so as to remove the disability on female heirs ..... statute but the same would not prevail over clear and unambiguous provision contained therein section 63 proof of will concurrent finding by courts that will was not validly ..... interfered with in appeal g sekar v geetha ors c a no 2535 2009 dd 15 4 .....