Section 188 - Judgment Search Results

Emperor Vs. Ram Bilas

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: (1908)ILR30All364

..... prepared in revision to interfere i dismiss the application criminal procedure code sections 188 et seqq procedure obstruction to public way jury i find it ..... same will show but in revision here it is urged that section 133 of the code of criminal procedure cannot apply to ..... among other grounds urged before me was that the notice under section 133 had never been legally served upon ram bilas neither .....

Emperor Vs. Govind Venkatesh Yalgi

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1908)10BOMLR1047

..... cantonment magistrate first class belgaum convicting the petitioner govind venkatesh yalgi of an offence under section 188 of the indian penal code in that he the petitioner disobeyed the order duly ..... discharge the rule and confirm the conviction and sentence penal code act xlv of i860 section 188 order promulgation of disobedience to the order picketing prohibition of public place a number .....

Louisville and Nashville R. Co. Vs. Mottley

Court: US Supreme Court

circuit court the court saying by mr justice peckham pp 188 u s 638 639 it would be wholly unnecessary and

Phoenix Bridge Co. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

12 13 1908 decided november 30 1908 211 u s 188 appeal from the court of claims syllabus in a contract

Twining Vs. State

Court: US Supreme Court

b 552 it is to be observed that not until 1883 did parliament which has an unlimited legislative power expressly provide

Old Dominion Copper Mining Co. Vs. Lewisohn

Court: US Supreme Court

entitled to recover from bigelow upon a substantially similar bill 188 mass 315 the facts alleged are as follows the property

Ware and Leland Vs. Mobile County

Court: US Supreme Court

done in very recent cases such as the lottery case 188 u s 321 where it was held that the transportation

Cleveland, C., C. and St. L. Ry. Co. Vs. Porter

Court: US Supreme Court

court as to abutting property owners in shaffer v werling 188 u s 516 hibben v smith 191 u s 310

Adair Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... seriously interrupt or threaten to interrupt the business of the carrier those sections prescribe the mode in which controversies may be brought under the ..... 163 state v goodwill 33 w va 179 gillespie v people 188 illinois 176 state v kreutzberg 114 wisconsin 530 wallace v georgia ..... employers on one side and the organizations page 208 u s 188 of railway employees as the other there will be a measure .....

Ex Parte Young

Court: US Supreme Court

..... states and long therefore before the ratification of that amendment the restrictions embodied in the section were therefore but a partial accomplishment of the more comprehensive result effectuated by the prohibitions ..... such a suit could be maintained it would have been subjected page 209 u s 188 to the jurisdiction of the court by process served upon its governor and attorney general .....