Section 18 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: section 18 Year: 1908 Page 1 of about 770 results (1.121 seconds)Government of Bombay Vs. Karim Tar Mahomed
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-18-1908
Reported in: (1908)10BOMLR660
macleod j 1 this is a reference from the collector of bombay under section 18 of the land acquisition act to determine the amount of compensation to be awarded to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMiyaji Alias Mahomed Ghouse Sahib Vs. Sheik Ahmed Sahib and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-24-1908
Reported in: (1908)18MLJ205
..... brought by the plaintiff under section 14 of act xx of 1863 after having obtained the sanction under section 18 of the act to remove ..... as to the amount payable we dismiss the appeal with costs section 16 1 c tarun chatterjee aftab alam jj ready and willing ..... matter before supreme court held concurrent finding cannot be interfered with section 20 tarun chatterjee aftab alam jj whether time is the essence .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAmIn Miran Sahib and ors. Vs. Medan HussaIn Sahib
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-22-1908
Reported in: 4Ind.Cas.1118
..... of suits referred to in section 14 that sanction is required under section 18 the district judge has therefore ..... no jurisdiction to grant sanction in the present case and the sanction is set aside with costs religious endowments act xx of 1863 sections 14 18 ..... is only such suits that are contemplated by section 14 of the religious endowments act and it .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn Re: Esufali Salebhai
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-23-1908
Reported in: (1908)10BOMLR994
..... compensation for the land by section 18 the collector is to be guided by the provision of section 23 in determining the amount of compensation by section 23 sub section 1 in determining the amount ..... other sums for damage and expenses under headings secondly to sixthly in that sub section under sub section 2 fifteen per centum for compulsory acquisition are to be added only to the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGanga Dayal Vs. Mani Ram and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-22-1908
Reported in: (1909)ILR31All156
..... that accordingly the right of plaintiff no 2 was also barred 2 section 18 of act xl of 1858 which was in force at the ..... present case unquestionably arose when the defendants took possession in 1886 section 7 of the last mentioned act appears to apply to the ..... and accordingly plaintiffs cannot succeed unless they come under the provisions of section 8 and can show that neither of them was capable of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGanga Dayal and anr. Vs. Mani Ram and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-22-1908
Reported in: 1Ind.Cas.824
..... that accordingly the right of plaintiff no 2 was also barred 2 section 18 of act xl of 1858 which was in force at the ..... present case unquestionably arose when the defendants took possession in 1886 section 7 of the last mentioned act appears to apply to the ..... and accordingly plaintiffs cannot succeed unless they come under the provisions of section 8 and can show that neither of them was capable of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMutikulandia Pillay Vs. Nalla Kakkan Arubalam and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-20-1908
Reported in: 4Ind.Cas.1109a
..... seeks to avail himself of the special procedure by way of distress provided for by section 18 of the rent recovery act to show that the requirements of the act have been ..... appeals are dismissed with costs landlord and tenant rent recovery act mad viii of 1865 section 18 distress under onus of showing compliance with requirements of law
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMunicipal Corporation of Pabna Vs. Jogendra NaraIn Raikut and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-10-1908
Reported in: 4Ind.Cas.332
..... and they evidently asked for references the references would be under section 18 of the act and in a proceeding for the ascertainment of ..... compensation on a reference under section 18 the claimant is to be regarded as the plaintiff and the ..... authority has not the power to ask for a reference under section 18 of the act neither does the act give it the right .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTOld Dominion Copper Mining Co. Vs. Lewisohn
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-18-1908
stockholder old dominion copper mining and smelting co v bigelow 188 mass 315 327 if there had been innocent members at
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmith Vs. Rainey
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-16-1908
hoyt smith of the said sum of eighteen thousand dollars 18 000 so advanced by him for the purchase of said
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial