Section 1745 - Judgment Search Results

United States Vs. Mosby

Court: US Supreme Court

..... in 24 ct cl 1 it is provided as follows by section 1745 of the revised statutes the president is authorized to prescribe ..... sued for by the claimant fall within the class mentioned in section 1745 of such as are expressly declared by law the question ..... for official services within the regulations prescribed by the president under section 1745 the claimant acted with propriety and with a high sense of .....

Tennessee Vs. Davis

Court: US Supreme Court

..... jurisdiction as laid down in story s commentaries on the constitution sec 1745 or an indirect mode of exercising original jurisdiction as intimated in ..... lessee 1 wheat 304 14 u s 349 2 story const sec 1745 none of the advocates of the power of removal as applied ..... of the constitution acts of congress and international treaties curtis com sec 210 all agree that the original jurisdiction of the supreme .....

United States Vs. Eaton

Court: US Supreme Court

..... one of first impression page 169 u s 351 by section 1745 of the revised statutes the president is authorized to prescribe ..... temporary vice consuls and the manner of their payment these sections are as follows 36 vice consuls general deputy consuls general ..... designation was within the regulation for emergency appointments provided in section 87 the first requisite for calling the emergency power into .....

Raja Rajeswara Dorai Alias Muthuramalinga Dorai Late a Minor Through H ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1915)ILR38Mad321

..... what lord halsbury in his laws of england volume 20 section 1745 says on this point where the representee has been induced ..... substantive rights and obligations were at once created by those sections without the person who invokes those principles in his favour ..... by coercion undue influence fraud misrepresentation or mistake reading sections 10 and 14 together therefore an agreement to which consent .....

V. Gangaram Vs. Regional Joint Director and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1997SC2776; JT1997(5)SC385; 1997(4)SCALE92; (1997)6SCC139; [1997]3SCR1043

hardship 8 the appeal is accordingly disposed of no costs section 11 s b sinha dr mukundakam sharma jj res judicata

Malhotra Steel Syndicate Vs. Punjab Chemi-plants Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: I(1993)BC177(SC); 1993Supp(3)SCC565

allowed accordingly there will be no order as to costs section 11 s b sinha dr mukundakam sharma jj res judicata

Ved Prakash Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1988SC77; 1988(36)BLJR77; JT1987(4)SC121; 1988LabIC331; 1987(2)SCALE795a; (1987)4SCC584; 1988(1)LC169(SC)

retire the petitioner the special leave petition therefore is dismissed section 6 dr arijit pasayat asok kumar ganguly jj suit for

State of Haryana Vs. Naresh Kumar Bali

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1994(4)SC184; (1995)IILLJ108SC; 1994(2)SCALE1105; (1994)4SCC448; 1994(2)LC226(SC)

have indicated above accordingly the appeal is allowed no costs section 6 dr arijit pasayat asok kumar ganguly jj suit for

The Krishnakumar Mills Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1972)4SCC172; 1971(III)LC278(SC)

is dismissed there will be no order as to costs section 6 dr arijit pasayat asok kumar ganguly jj suit for

Durga Das Vs. the Collector and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1996SC2786; 1996(6)SCALE199; (1996)5SCC618; [1996]Supp4SCR370

be discharged 4 the appeal is accordingly dismissed no costs section 7 dr arijit pasayat d k jain dr mukundakam sharma