Section 174 - Judgment Search Results

Shashadhar Chowdhury Vs. Bishun NaraIn Kundu and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1926Cal738

..... code and of rendering inapplicable the special restriction imposed by section 174 sub section 3 he cites as illustrating the principles to be applied ..... i do not therefore consider that it is legitimate to interpret section 174 3 in any way which restricts its prima facie meaning ..... purchase at a sale held under chapter xiv could notwithstanding section 174 3 have brought a suit to set aside the sale .....

Emperor Vs. Kazi Dawood Kazi

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1926)28BOMLR79

..... before him shall be deemed to lave committed an offence under section 174 section 175 or section 176 of the indian penal code section 19 provides all evidence given under the act shall be on ..... in towns other than the presidency towns under section 174 of the criminal procedure code it is provided by section 175 that the police officer proceeding under section 174 may by an order in writing summon two .....

Carroll Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... and forfeited as provided in the revised statutes section 2140 and again in alaska by section 174 of the act of march 3 1899 c ..... 178 and was thereafter embodied in the revised statutes as section 3061 neither section 3061 nor any of its earlier counterparts has ever ..... may be seized under the warrant and be ultimately destroyed the section further provides no search warrant shall issue to search any .....

Sasadhar Choudhury Vs. Bishnu NaraIn Kunda

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 94Ind.Cas.292

..... and the district judge of burdwan on the ground that section 174 sub section 3 of the bengal tenancy act provides that s 313 ..... code and of rendering inapplicable the special restriction imposed by section 174 sub section 3 he cites as illustrating the principles to be applied ..... with costs one gold mohur bengal tenancy act viii of 1885 section 174 3 civil procedure code act v of 1908 order xxi rule 91 .....

Emperor Vs. Bhirgu Singh

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1927All122

..... summarily by a magistrate of the first class and convicted under section 174 of the indian penal code the offence alleged against him ..... this document says that failure to attend shall be punishable under section 174 of the indian penal code the document is further headed ..... party here was therefore not guilty of an offence punishable under section 174 i p c and was rightly acquitted by the learned .....

St. Louis, B. and M. Ry. Co. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

person using its facilities it may page 268 u s 174 exact payment either in advance or upon the completion of

Arkansas Ex Rel. Utley Vs. St. Louis-san Francisco Ry. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

which the judgment of the maccabees page 269 u s 174 was to be paid they made a separate assessment on

Firm Bisesar Ram-dassi Ram Vs. Firm Har Kishen-pahlad Rai

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1925All412; 87Ind.Cas.370

..... on the 16th of august 1924 the defendant applied for restoration under section 17 of the provincial small causes courts act when he applied for ..... restoration the defendant deposited the sum of rs 174 7 9 which was the amount due under the decree at the ..... correct ha would have to deposit not only the sum of rs 174 7 9 but would have to calculate the exact amount of interest .....

Weller Vs. New York

Court: US Supreme Court

..... mcreynolds delivered the opinion of the court chapter 590 new york laws 1922 added eight sections 167 174 to the general business law of the state they are copied in the margin ..... brazee v michigan 241 u s 340 the statute itself declares 174 in case it be judicially determined that any section of this article is unconstitutional or otherwise invalid such determination shall .....

Chaudhuri Shib NaraIn Vs. Gajadhar and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 92Ind.Cas.772

..... of the half mortgaged to baldeo he alleged that he had deposited certain monies under section 83 of the transfer of property act that the defendant refused to withdraw the ..... l j 807 3 u p l r a 139 a i r 1922 all 174 f b for holding that even the second and third mortgages in this case ..... l j 807 3 u p l r a 139 a i r 1922 all 174 f b we are perfectly satisfied that on the terms of the second mortgage .....