Section 1696 - Judgment Search Results

C. J. Hendry Co. Vs. Moore

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 10 1940 suppl wisconsin stat 1941 29 05 7 footnote 17 section 9 of the judiciary act of 1789 1 stat 77 provided ..... see also root the relations of pennsylvania with the british government 1696 1765 p 117 n 100 washburne imperial control of the administration ..... in connection with colonial trading matters under the navigation act of 1696 were to be prosecuted exclusively in courts of admiralty and the .....

intel Corp. Vs. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... serve process unless they have filed suit ibid emphasis in original section 1696 a however is not limited to service of process it ..... with the 1964 revision of 1782 brief for petitioner 27 section 1696 a authorizes federal district courts to order service of any ..... courts and quasi judicial agencies 2 72 stat 1743 emphasis added section 1782 had previously referred to any judicial proceeding the rules .....

V. Gangaram Vs. Regional Joint Director and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1997SC2776; JT1997(5)SC385; 1997(4)SCALE92; (1997)6SCC139; [1997]3SCR1043

hardship 8 the appeal is accordingly disposed of no costs section 11 s b sinha dr mukundakam sharma jj res judicata

Malhotra Steel Syndicate Vs. Punjab Chemi-plants Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: I(1993)BC177(SC); 1993Supp(3)SCC565

allowed accordingly there will be no order as to costs section 11 s b sinha dr mukundakam sharma jj res judicata

Ved Prakash Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1988SC77; 1988(36)BLJR77; JT1987(4)SC121; 1988LabIC331; 1987(2)SCALE795a; (1987)4SCC584; 1988(1)LC169(SC)

retire the petitioner the special leave petition therefore is dismissed section 6 dr arijit pasayat asok kumar ganguly jj suit for

State of Haryana Vs. Naresh Kumar Bali

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1994(4)SC184; (1995)IILLJ108SC; 1994(2)SCALE1105; (1994)4SCC448; 1994(2)LC226(SC)

have indicated above accordingly the appeal is allowed no costs section 6 dr arijit pasayat asok kumar ganguly jj suit for

The Krishnakumar Mills Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1972)4SCC172; 1971(III)LC278(SC)

is dismissed there will be no order as to costs section 6 dr arijit pasayat asok kumar ganguly jj suit for

Durga Das Vs. the Collector and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1996SC2786; 1996(6)SCALE199; (1996)5SCC618; [1996]Supp4SCR370

be discharged 4 the appeal is accordingly dismissed no costs section 7 dr arijit pasayat d k jain dr mukundakam sharma

Nihal Chand Rameshwar Dass and anr. Vs. Vinod Rastogi and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1994(4)SC113; (1995)109PLR298; 1994(2)SCALE967; (1994)4SCC325; 1994(2)LC181(SC)

dismissed there shall however be no order as to costs section 7 dr arijit pasayat d k jain dr mukundakam sharma

Managing Director, Orissa Construction Corpn. and ors. Vs. Shyam Sunda ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1992(II)OLR515

in the above terms with no order as to costs section 7 dr arijit pasayat d k jain dr mukundakam sharma